Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. wonder if my Mickey Mantle cards are worth anyything nowadays?
  3. Thank goodness he has then thunder thighs! So happy he is ok and hopefully this is just a bump in the road.
  4. Great to see this update on Missouri RB Ahmad Hardy.
  5. Seems light for a safety but hopefully this is legit interest. Assume he will need to bump one of those 5 OVs for us
  6. I got this Bijan to 50 future 15 recently
  7. I do think T.O.P. is a strong indicator of whether or not your trenches are dominant on both sides of the football. It won't dictate whether or not you win/lose games, but I do think it showcases the ability for teams to win at the line of scrimmage more times than not. I was very surprised to see Notre Dame as low on the T.O.P. rankings as they were given their running game and ability to beat teams up front.
  8. Another way to look at that data is 5 of the teams on the bottom of your list were all ranked in the top 12 of the final CFB Rankings last season. That’s 43% (5 of the top 12) ranked teams were outside the top 75 in time of possession. Tech, OU, Notre Dame, Texas, and Ole Miss. 3 of those 5 teams (25%) made the Playoffs, and the other 2 teams were the first out (ND, Texas). And North Texas would’ve made the Playoffs too if they’d beaten Tulane in the AAC CG. Personally, I don’t think time of possession is a terribly relevant offensive statistic any longer in modern college football. It’s the flip side of many of the advanced offensive efficiency metrics. If you can score points while requiring fewer offensive plays to do so, that’s a more efficient offense. That said, I DO think time of possession can be an indicative stat for defense (counter intuitively) as the more snaps your defense faces on the field, the more likely the opposing teams are to eventually score points. Of course, ND, OU, and Tech all had top defenses last season, so T.O.P. isn’t revealing defensive fatigue either.
  9. I dont know when to sell. Me no smart.
  10. Oh man that's awesome. Update us how that goes.
  11. I'm impressed you've hung on to them for so long.
  12. That's nasty!
  13. Friend of mine one got this signed at the Belton show last weekend for me. It was a PSA 10 crackout. Going back to PSA for dual service. Hoping for a PSA 9 Auto 10 🤘🏼🤞🏼
  14. An improved offensive line and run game should certainly help this case. 2025: Texas ranked 109th (28:29.92) 2024: Texas ranked 74th (29:51.63) 2023: Texas ranked 36th (31:13.14) 2022: Texas ranked 120th (27:18.62) 2021: Texas ranked 110th (28:05.67)
  15. That doesn’t surprise me given the offensive inefficiency in the first half of the season and PK’s bend don’t break defense. I would expect better this year although the schedule will play a role in dictating that.
  16. Here are two recent Arch pick ups.
  17. One day LaMelo will figure it out and I'll be rich!
  18. Had to get that thing in a one touch immediately lol
  19. As I typically do around this time of the year, I found an interesting stat that I believe must change for Texas to reach the heights they want to in 2026. A look at the time of possession from teams that won 10+ games a year ago. *** 2. James Madison (34:12.71) 3. Georgia (33:52.43) 5. Ohio State (33:07.00) 7. Miami (33:04.44) 9. BYU (32:43.21) 10. Indiana (32:37.94) 11. Navy (32:36.92) 14. Texas A&M (32:30.31) 16. Houston (32:18.08) 18. Virginia (32:16.14) 27. Alabama (31:32.33) 36. Vanderbilt (31:00.69) 40. Tulane (30:51.64) 41. Oregon (30:48.73) 42. Utah (30:47.77) 74. Oklahoma (29:44.31) 76. Texas Tech (29:39.86) 87. Notre Dame (29:17.92) 106. Ole Miss (28:43.87) 109. Texas (28:29.92) 112. North Texas (28:23.07) *** Only three teams with 10+ wins a year ago had a time of possession ranking outside of the top 100, with the Longhorns having the second worst among the group. Only six of the 21 teams lost the time of possession battle. Ole Miss was an extreme outlier given how successful their run in the CFP was. Texas Tech did not score a point in the CFP and Oklahoma blew a 17-point lead at home in their meeting with Alabama. Notre Dame, North Texas and Texas all missed the CFP.
  20. Today
  21. Had to put it down and step away. Probably my biggest pull to date
  22. I understand that but this is not a typical series. Texas is playing Wagner game 1. I can see several scenarios where TK either doesn’t play or has a limited role. It might even be pitch by committee, similar to game 2 of the OU series. Last year, Kavan did not pitch in game 1 against Eastern Illinois; Cam started and pitched 3 innings, then Citlaly pitched 2 innings. Teagan started game 2 against Michigan and pitched 3.1 innings. Citlaly and Sophia Simpson finished the game. TK pitched the entire third game against UCF. Texas needs Kavan for game 2 and 3, not Wagner.
  23. Also the same school as 27 CB Joshua Dobson.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.