All Activity

Losing him and POSSIBLY getting Seaton does the staff no good imo

Bro wtf is going on? Is this a Flood thing? There better be a plan here or Sark will be on the hot seat for not addressing the line in both of Arch’s starting seasons….

Must have got a bag

Thank goodness UA is not our sponsor

Well we better start learning and hearing soon with Brooks gone 😂

Was not expecting Brooks to be a guy that portaled.

The staff needs to get Brooks back in the fold. That’s a likely starter the year after next. Figure it out and work to retain.

I would be amazed if we land Seaton. There are 2 prime LT spots open in Tuscaloosa and Athens.

Sucks for Nick Brooks, really thought he was going to become something

Brooks leaving? Making room? If he was projected at LG this year, I hope this means Brunner, and hopefully Seaton because this makes zero sense.

Everyone calm down just let the week play out lol

unless seaton is a longhorn in the next 24-36 hours Nick Brooks leaving makes no sense.

Fr what happened here? Unless...

With Brooks leaving I feel like Sark is making room for Seaton. Just like he forced out other players at different positions for upgrades.

Nick Brooks!!! WTF

bro what?

Did USC play the recruiting game all wrong? In my view, they gambled (taking advantage of a lack of solid regulation post-House settlement) and paid high schoolers to stay committed, racking up a huge 35-man high school class and the #1 class in the country. They went for a first-mover advantage to load up on talented youngsters. But given how things have unfolded this portal cycle, it seems like they tried to get an advantage in the wrong direction, spending significant outlays on young unproven talent. The cost of developing those kids even for a year is not going to be great for them. If things stay the same, it's likely that big class they signed are either going to (1) cost a ton of money to retain and still won't be proven talent; or (2) are going to hit the portal. And absent clauses that require buyouts for players to leave, they're not going to get ROI. (And the enforceability of such clauses is also up in the air and will take significant legal fees to enforce). Was this a gross miscalculation? Or maybe they figured they couldn't contend in the portal and made the conscious decision to load up on young talent at a lower price? Either way, it seems like they went left while most of the college world went right. And I'm not sure it bodes well for Lincoln Riley and Chad Bowden. Interested in everyone's thoughts @Bobby Burton @Gerry Hamilton @CJ Vogel @Jeff Howe I'll hang up and listen.

not a fake account.

Fake account. Lol.

Seems like he would be a good priced depth piece

This guy's saying Texas has second easiest SEC strength of schedule this season 🤘🏼⚾️

Working on a contract for a man not in the portal yet is a choice