All Activity

It’s a shame Winter was out of action for so long.

Winter looking like he won't go out of this inning

HBP and Sam Houston has the bases loaded with one out.

4 pitch walk, runners 1 and 2 w/ 1 out

The runner at second is really in Winters head.

Winter now trying to work around allowing a one-out double to right.

This uniform is my least favorite colorway

Nice little pop out for the 1st of the inning on the 1-1 pitch

Let’s go Winter! Show us what you got

Not since last year

I just asked if there was going to be a thread. 😂 anxiety meds are down the hatch and I'm ready to go🤘🏿

Is there no Sam Houston v Texas thread?

I hate this with every ounce of my body.

The Longhorns will send Michael Winter to the mound for a midweek tilt against the Bearkats. The game is being streamed on SEC Network Plus.

It about the NCAA laying the hammer on student athletes betting not about any particular team.

Already 68 teams add 4 more playin games =76

Thanks for the explanation. That makes sense.

Agree! And don’t get me wrong, I love TX WBB & love watching the really good womens’ teams play each other. Still way too much talent disparity in womens’ college basketball. Now they’re giving us even more unwatchable games in March.

The full faith and credit clause is a federal statute that requires federal courts to give credit to state court decisions. The Mississippi court entered the injunction first, so it was decided there first. If a federal case is brought in Texas it would be precluded by the prior Mississippi decision under the doctrine of res judicata—which means it has been decided in latin. If you didn’t have this rule, nothing would ever be final in the law in cases between the same parties. You would have endless lawsuits in different states and federal courts trying to get a different outcome. The case was between Chambliss and the NCAA. The NCAA is who decided eligibility, so someone else wouldnt have standing to sue Chambliss to prevent him from participating in Texas. Unsure if that answers your question but our country’s legal system is a balance between state and federal law known as federalism. There is no chance the case can be relitigated again. Chambliss is clear.

It took a minute but looking back I see that autocorrect was not my friend. I definitely should have proofread before posting

Water it down even more!!! This is so dumb. Making the tourney now is like getting a car from Opera.

Decisions such as these are based upon facts and opinions. Perhaps a Texas judge feels that he should not have been granted permission to play another year and rules against Chambliss. Granted this would have to go through the state rungs of the legal system before it would even be considered. I’m ignorant to the finer details of the legal process and was just wondering if there is a world where this could happen. I know this is apples to oranges but I view it similar to how gambling, speed limits and drinking ages are different in each state.

Yea…ok 🤦🏻‍♂️

Appears headed that way

Executive orders are only effective in the Executive Department of government. There are no legally recognized "small activist judges," whatever they might be.