Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So apparently the Big 12 has decided it doesn’t want to wait around for money anymore and is partnering with a private equity–backed fund to… checks notes …borrow against its own future. Very on-brand.

Here’s the gist: a new entity gets created, some conference commercial rights get parked in it, and a finance group backed by RedBird and Weatherford waves around up to $500 million in upfront cash. Schools can opt in, take the money now, and repay it later by giving up future conference distributions. It’s basically revenue sharing meets Payday Loans.

To be clear, this isn’t free money. This is the conference equivalent of saying, “Yes, I understand the interest rate, but have you seen the portal?”

For schools feeling squeezed by NIL demands, roster churn, and the general chaos of modern college football, this is a tempting lifeline. Immediate liquidity to keep up with the Joneses, plug holes, and stay competitive. For others, it’s a long-term mortgage on future payouts in a sport where the future changes every six months.

The most Big 12 part of this? It’s optional. Opt in if you need cash now. Opt out if you think you’ll be better off later. Translation: the resource gap inside the conference is about to get louder, not smaller.

Zooming out, this is another signal that college football is done pretending it’s not a business. Conferences aren’t just leagues anymore — they’re balance sheets with logos. And once private capital starts slicing up “future distributions,” there’s no unringing that bell. History says those bets usually age… creatively.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Steamboat Willie said:

So apparently the Big 12 has decided it doesn’t want to wait around for money anymore and is partnering with a private equity–backed fund to… checks notes …borrow against its own future. Very on-brand.

Here’s the gist: a new entity gets created, some conference commercial rights get parked in it, and a finance group backed by RedBird and Weatherford waves around up to $500 million in upfront cash. Schools can opt in, take the money now, and repay it later by giving up future conference distributions. It’s basically revenue sharing meets Payday Loans.

To be clear, this isn’t free money. This is the conference equivalent of saying, “Yes, I understand the interest rate, but have you seen the portal?”

For schools feeling squeezed by NIL demands, roster churn, and the general chaos of modern college football, this is a tempting lifeline. Immediate liquidity to keep up with the Joneses, plug holes, and stay competitive. For others, it’s a long-term mortgage on future payouts in a sport where the future changes every six months.

The most Big 12 part of this? It’s optional. Opt in if you need cash now. Opt out if you think you’ll be better off later. Translation: the resource gap inside the conference is about to get louder, not smaller.

Zooming out, this is another signal that college football is done pretending it’s not a business. Conferences aren’t just leagues anymore — they’re balance sheets with logos. And once private capital starts slicing up “future distributions,” there’s no unringing that bell. History says those bets usually age… creatively.

This thing got out of hand quickly. I like NIL for a number of reasons, but to safeguard the integrity of the sport and these young athletes, it should have had better guardrails in place from the start. 

Posted (edited)

Short version:

The Big 12 didn’t find a new revenue stream.It found a way to advance its allowance. Whether that’s smart leverage or a payday loan depends entirely on how well these schools spend it — and how ugly the next round of realignment gets.

Either way, welcome to college football’s private equity era. Please keep your receipts.

Edited by Steamboat Willie
Posted
6 minutes ago, Steamboat Willie said:

So apparently the Big 12 has decided it doesn’t want to wait around for money anymore and is partnering with a private equity–backed fund to… checks notes …borrow against its own future. Very on-brand.

Here’s the gist: a new entity gets created, some conference commercial rights get parked in it, and a finance group backed by RedBird and Weatherford waves around up to $500 million in upfront cash. Schools can opt in, take the money now, and repay it later by giving up future conference distributions. It’s basically revenue sharing meets Payday Loans.

To be clear, this isn’t free money. This is the conference equivalent of saying, “Yes, I understand the interest rate, but have you seen the portal?”

For schools feeling squeezed by NIL demands, roster churn, and the general chaos of modern college football, this is a tempting lifeline. Immediate liquidity to keep up with the Joneses, plug holes, and stay competitive. For others, it’s a long-term mortgage on future payouts in a sport where the future changes every six months.

The most Big 12 part of this? It’s optional. Opt in if you need cash now. Opt out if you think you’ll be better off later. Translation: the resource gap inside the conference is about to get louder, not smaller.

Zooming out, this is another signal that college football is done pretending it’s not a business. Conferences aren’t just leagues anymore — they’re balance sheets with logos. And once private capital starts slicing up “future distributions,” there’s no unringing that bell. History says those bets usually age… creatively.

Can't wait for what happens when theses schools go into collections for non payment.   

Posted (edited)

A rewrite for Tuesday:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

Careful — that’s not Portal Claus on the roof anymore. That’s his private-equity cousin, and he brought term sheets.

Here comes Krampus, here comes Krampus,
Right down Deadline Lane.
Funds advancing, futures financing,
Revenue shares in chains.

NIL checks, backroom decks,
Discounted cash-flow dreams.
What fun it is to hit refresh
While PE buys tomorrow’s teams.

Same tune. Corporate lyrics.
Merry Transfermas — now with leverage.

                                                           

Edited by Steamboat Willie
  • Haha 3
Posted
Just now, Rocky P said:

Can't wait for what happens when theses schools go into collections for non payment.   

Agreed.  The financial mismanagement in the pros is bad enough, but the collegiate game is starting to look like a financial train wreck for most P4 schools.  The collision will happen just about the time that TV contracts expire and the ACC's exit fee reaches its $75MM minimum (around 2030).  IMO, at that point there could be a division of the haves and have nots.  The haves will be most of the SEC, 5-7 from the Big 10, 3-4 schools from the ACC, and Tech from the Big 12.  Does the SEC stay intact while the other haves form a football only conference, or is a 20-24 team football conference formed including the financially capable SEC teams?  The rest of the schools will likely be waiving the white flag (to various extents) on NIL/rev share at that point.  The Arkansas and Iowa St ADs have admitted as much.  I'm sure the message from Iowa State's AD played a big part in Matt Campbell finally jumping ship, although Penn State is a great opportunity for him.      

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, jhookem91 said:

Agreed.  The financial mismanagement in the pros is bad enough, but the collegiate game is starting to look like a financial train wreck for most P4 schools.  The collision will happen just about the time that TV contracts expire and the ACC's exit fee reaches its $75MM minimum (around 2030).  IMO, at that point there could be a division of the haves and have nots.  The haves will be most of the SEC, 5-7 from the Big 10, 3-4 schools from the ACC, and Tech from the Big 12.  Does the SEC stay intact while the other haves form a football only conference, or is a 20-24 team football conference formed including the financially capable SEC teams?  The rest of the schools will likely be waiving the white flag (to various extents) on NIL/rev share at that point.  The Arkansas and Iowa St ADs have admitted as much.  I'm sure the message from Iowa State's AD played a big part in Matt Campbell finally jumping ship, although Penn State is a great opportunity for him.      

That take is probably closer to the truth than most people want to admit.

What we’re watching isn’t some abstract NIL growing pain — it’s a capital structure problem finally colliding with reality. A bunch of schools are operating like pro franchises without pro revenue certainty, and now they’re layering leverage on top of volatility. That works right up until it doesn’t. The timing you’re pointing to is key. TV deals rolling over, ACC exit fees collapsing, private equity sniffing around future distributions — all of that converges around the same window. When that happens, the sport won’t politely rebalance. It’ll bifurcate.

Edited by Steamboat Willie
  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, jhookem91 said:

Agreed.  The financial mismanagement in the pros is bad enough, but the collegiate game is starting to look like a financial train wreck for most P4 schools.  The collision will happen just about the time that TV contracts expire and the ACC's exit fee reaches its $75MM minimum (around 2030).  IMO, at that point there could be a division of the haves and have nots.  The haves will be most of the SEC, 5-7 from the Big 10, 3-4 schools from the ACC, and Tech from the Big 12.  Does the SEC stay intact while the other haves form a football only conference, or is a 20-24 team football conference formed including the financially capable SEC teams?  The rest of the schools will likely be waiving the white flag (to various extents) on NIL/rev share at that point.  The Arkansas and Iowa St ADs have admitted as much.  I'm sure the message from Iowa State's AD played a big part in Matt Campbell finally jumping ship, although Penn State is a great opportunity for him.      

If this results in Arkansas waiving the white flag, then count me in. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Steamboat Willie said:

That take is probably closer to the truth than most people want to admit.

What we’re watching isn’t some abstract NIL growing pain — it’s a capital structure problem finally colliding with reality. A bunch of schools are operating like pro franchises without pro revenue certainty, and now they’re layering leverage on top of volatility. That works right up until it doesn’t. The timing you’re pointing to is key. TV deals rolling over, ACC exit fees collapsing, private equity sniffing around future distributions — all of that converges around the same window. When that happens, the sport won’t politely rebalance. It’ll bifurcate.

I'm still not sure how these PE firms are able to get involved with these public institutions.  Wouldn't the state legislature have to approve them and the terms?  State of Texas isn't going to just let UT start selling off pieces of itself.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Tuco Ramirez said:

If this results in Arkansas waiving the white flag, then count me in. 

A smaller group of programs with scale, donor depth, media value, and political leverage will keep playing at the highest level. Everyone else will quietly redefine “competitive” and call it sustainability. Not because they want to — because the math forces it.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Rocky P said:

I'm still not sure how these PE firms are able to get involved with these public institutions.  Wouldn't the state legislature have to approve them and the terms?  State of Texas isn't going to just let UT start selling off pieces of itself.

PE isn’t buying the school. They’re buying future revenue streams, usually at the conference or affiliate-entity level, not carving up public universities like a private company. No PE firm wants oversight committees. These deals are structured specifically to avoid statehouse headaches. The moment a legislature can rewrite the terms, PE loses interest. That’s how this sneaks past the “how is this legal?” alarm bells. Think of it less as privatization and more as: “We mortgaged next decade’s TV checks because the portal is on fire today.”

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Rocky P said:

I'm still not sure how these PE firms are able to get involved with these public institutions.  Wouldn't the state legislature have to approve them and the terms?  State of Texas isn't going to just let UT start selling off pieces of itself.

You would think so, but unfortunately the vast majority of the politicians will go along with it due to political pressure from voters.  Most politicians (especially in the last 20 years) are the most financially irresponsible people around.  They don't make pragmatic, financially sound decisions anymore because those decisions are unpopular.  

Posted
22 minutes ago, jhookem91 said:

You would think so, but unfortunately the vast majority of the politicians will go along with it due to political pressure from voters.  Most politicians (especially in the last 20 years) are the most financially irresponsible people around.  They don't make pragmatic, financially sound decisions anymore because those decisions are unpopular.  

Most of this stuff is deliberately structured around legislatures, not through them. The conference cuts the deal, creates a separate commercial entity, and schools are just “licensing” rights or adjusting future distributions. On paper, the university isn’t selling the family silver — it’s just refinancing expected revenue. That distinction is doing a lot of legal work.

And yes, when it does brush up against state oversight, the political incentive is basically nonexistent to stop it. Nobody wants to be the lawmaker who gets tagged as “the reason our school fell behind in NIL.” Fiscal restraint loses every time to booster pressure and talk radio outrage.

So you end up with the worst combo:

  • Complex financial engineering most voters don’t understand
  • Short political time horizons
  • Long-term obligations that won’t come due until everyone involved has moved on

It’s not that legislators are voting “yes” after careful analysis — it’s that the deals are designed so they never have to vote at all. And when the bill comes due in 8–10 years, it’ll be someone else’s problem.

Which, honestly, might be the most college-football thing of all.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Steamboat Willie said:

Short version:

The Big 12 didn’t find a new revenue stream.It found a way to advance its allowance. Whether that’s smart leverage or a payday loan depends entirely on how well these schools spend it — and how ugly the next round of realignment gets.

Either way, welcome to college football’s private equity era. Please keep your receipts.

If you take the loan will they payroll deduct with 36% interest?😁

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.