Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This sucks hard for them. On one hand, this makes for some hard decisions with going back to Weigman for more reliability in the passing game, since no team would be scared by Reed being their sole rushing threat at that point. On the other hand if Reed is out, they truly have no rushing attack.

Texas 8-4 is back, too bad it’s because of injuries

Posted
  On 11/4/2024 at 8:37 PM, Weino said:

This sucks hard for them. On one hand, this makes for some hard decisions with going back to Weigman for more reliability in the passing game, since no team would be scared by Reed being their sole rushing threat at that point. On the other hand if Reed is out, they truly have no rushing attack.

Texas 8-4 is back, too bad it’s because of injuries

Expand  

A&M offense with Weigman is a train wreck

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted
  On 11/4/2024 at 11:59 PM, ITMotive said:

Sucks for them. Honestly, I don't like to see it.  You want to see them at full strength and us at full strength for our matchup. 

Expand  

IDGAF about their RB issues.  Texas has been playing the whole year without Baxter and Clark.  Blue and Wisner have both been dinged for chunks of time this year as well.  Ryan Niblett had to be moved to play some RB.  Even our last minute SMU transfer has missed several games.

I'd agree with you if there was some fairy dust available that could make Baxter and Clark available, but there isn't.  Their recent injuries just serves to make the RB problems similar for both teams.

  • Hook 'Em 5
Posted (edited)
  On 11/5/2024 at 12:19 AM, southpaw said:

IDGAF about their RB issues.  Texas has been playing the whole year without Baxter and Clark.  Blue and Wisner have both been dinged for chunks of time this year as well.  Ryan Niblett had to be moved to play some RB.  Even our last minute SMU transfer has missed several games.

I'd agree with you if there was some fairy dust available that could make Baxter and Clark available, but there isn't.  Their recent injuries just serves to make the RB problems similar for both teams.

Expand  

Uh yeah - see the second half of my last sentence. 

Edited by ITMotive
Posted
  On 11/5/2024 at 12:53 AM, ITMotive said:

Uh yeah - see the second half of my last sentence. 

Expand  

Well, we have not been at full strength since the second day of fall practice (and down 2 after one week), so lamenting aggie RB injuries in week 11 seems pretty meh to me.  But yeah, if we could magically have a 100% healthy RB room for all 11 weeks, I'd sign up for it.

Posted
  On 11/5/2024 at 3:16 AM, southpaw said:

Well, we have not been at full strength since the second day of fall practice (and down 2 after one week), so lamenting aggie RB injuries in week 11 seems pretty meh to me.  But yeah, if we could magically have a 100% healthy RB room for all 11 weeks, I'd sign up for it.

Expand  

Fair enough.  Point well made. 

Posted
  On 11/4/2024 at 8:37 PM, Weino said:

This sucks hard for them. On one hand, this makes for some hard decisions with going back to Weigman for more reliability in the passing game, since no team would be scared by Reed being their sole rushing threat at that point. On the other hand if Reed is out, they truly have no rushing attack.

Texas 8-4 is back, too bad it’s because of injuries

Expand  

?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.