Lnghrn

Good question on #3

Deloitte is supposed to be the independent organization that monitor whether NIL is legit going forward. The idea is to get rid of “play for pay” and instead pay players for true marketing of their name image likeness. In other words nil would be more like pro athlete endorsement deals.

Not sure rev vs non-rev matters to the donor. I don’t give to Texas one fund to help generate more $ for UT football. I give to help make the program successful. What matters is the whether the people that give the money feel like they received the return on their investment. In the case of NIL, donors are not looking for a monetary return but instead satisfaction from the success of the program they donate to.

I doubt aggy has 9 championships in all of their years since they have been in SEC

Any word on the official visit date?

Impressive video. Show great quickness for his size.

Seems like with the schools listed academics may be more of a consideration with him. Is that the case Garry?

Pretty disgusting. Amazing that the players have the motto and just plain stupid that a college player disclosed it as if it was no big deal.

Gerry - did these 3 make it in? How were visits?

Excellent podcast. Really good questions by Chris and insight from Sark.

Can’t believe Lincoln Riley hasn’t been fired yet. The guy runs a soft-ass program where players are not developed.

Thanks Jeff

Another great feather in the cap for those coaches in recruiting

Baker signed arguably the top DT in the country and he wasnt considered at splash hire

The program is coming off of 2 straight final four appearances, a great rb history with nfl, NIL, Sparks’s offensive reputation, great culture. The reasons are very long why recruits pick UT. The program is in a much position today than anytime over the past 15 years. The running back coach isn’t going to be the sole reason why recruits pick a school.