Glass Joe

I wonder if Sean Payton sees a bit of a Taysom Hill type of asset in Sam Ehlinger?

Who will be the starting LT if Zuhn folds inside to Center? Are they going to put true frosh L.Rogers out there to protect M.Reed’s backside this year? That’ll be a win-prevention strategy.

Well, Reed’s passing appears to be in mid-season form already.

Maybe he’s playing for the aggy basketball team instead?

Duke Pettijohn got his kid a better deal than Texas was willing to offer. Enjoy Columbus!

Most aggies can’t spell ROI

19 yards, but who is counting. 😂

You really can’t blame Zach…the long-term damage to his body of 9 career NFL carries can’t be underestimated.

Bosworth - OU Crabtree - Tech

Sark destroying Kirby during SEC media days. Love it!

Flip or no?

I hope you’re wrong. I’d prefer Bishop get all the reps possible at WR, and let Lott to elsewhere.

@Gerry Hamilton did we get outbid here, or is this Texas choosing to allocate the funds to another position (instead of paying up for a 5th DT in the class)?

Do we think this will impact Texas’ on-field success as much as missing on Denver Harris or Zach Evans?

That’s the revenue sharing component, not the total compensation. I’m not sure a P4 school is going to be competitive on the field if they choose to not payout the $20.5M allowable to athletes under the revenue sharing component. So, the $20.5m revenue share acts as a “floor” for the total compensation athletes at a P4 school can receive. But the $20.5M revenue share is not the total compensation for athletes, and doesn’t act as a compensation “cap” for athletes. Legit NIL layered on top of the $20.5M revenue share is the total athletes compensation per school, and I don’t believe there can be any “cap” on this (legally). So, the $31M for Missouri in total compensation to athletes under NIL makes sense in this context. I also think this is where the “Texas spends $35M” rumor got started a few weeks back.