DanielOnorato

Good, 🖕🏻

Cool, you came off as an asshole

Over my head. Sorry.

If you have an injury like he did it's a whole new conversation my friend. Same for CJ Baxter even if he produces extremely well collegiately before the draft he's nobody somebody will trade up for. High risk high reward when you deal with big injuries.

I wouldn't touch that kid. Might be a pro sleeper but nah.

Daylon McCutcheon is better. 🤘🏼

He sucked

Their wideouts are relatively young. I think the room will be one of the better ones in all of college football next season regardless of imports but being cautious of exports. I think Wingo, Moore, Mosley, Livingstone, Bishop, Kohen Brown, Lockett, Mccutcheon will all eventually be NFL players.

Depends on 40 time but I'd advise him to stay in school 100%. He can get paid well in college, hopefully he stays at Texas. I think he's an incredibly talented kid, fast as hell and proved to be one of Texas most valuable players this season.

Usually means heavy money is coming in for Texas so the odds are decreasing in value so the house is less exposed or a potential leak from sources that Texas has a much better chance to get in than originally anticipated. The movement bodes well for Texas as far as the line and odds.

Great hire by LSU. Essentially setting back Ole Miss run this season and getting their main target.

Really hoping James Madison wins it all

Add on top of it that more playoff teams means more games played against playoff competition to reach the championship. There is absolutely no reason to schedule tough non con games moving forward. It will only hurt your case.

Not necessarily. I would like them to go back to the BCS formula. The BCS formula was explicitly designed to incorporate strength of schedule (SOS) as a key component alongside human polls and a penalty for each loss. "Quality Wins" Bonus: Later iterations of the formula added a bonus for beating top-15 teams, further rewarding teams that challenged themselves. Mitigating Penalties: Playing a hard schedule meant that a loss against a "team of substance" was not punished as severely as a loss to a weak team. Strength of Schedule Component: Teams were ranked 1 through 115 (at the time) based on the winning percentages of their opponents and their opponents' opponents. A team's rank in this category contributed to their overall BCS score (lower score was better, like golf). Key Example: 2007 LSU Tigers The 2007 college football season is the most famous instance where the traditional emphasis on an unblemished record was overturned by the BCS system's flexibility. LSU's Record: LSU finished the regular season with two losses. The Outcome: The Tigers were selected to play for the national championship and ultimately won the BCS National Championship, the first and only two-loss team ever to do so in the BCS era.

I'd rather Texas be weak and timid according to folks if it means Texas is in the playoffs.