All Activity
- Past hour
-
A โHiโ from Dia Bell ๐
Gerry Hamilton replied to hookemholds's topic in On Texas Football Forum
lol -
Missouri Tabs $31 Million in NIL Spending
Burnt Orange Horn replied to CJ Vogel's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Misery at $31M a year in athletics is likely unsustainable. -
I didn't say the one Goosby was waiting on, but did say the offer was expected to happen. Texas will be right there for Goosby. Texas OV will be in September
-
4-star+ RB KJ Edwards commits to Texas A&M
Burnt Orange Horn replied to Gerry Hamilton's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Failing to get commitments from recruits who do not want to win on the field for Texas nor win in life off the field at Texas is not a loss. It is dodging a bullet. NIL bag chasers do not build great teams. Sarkisian builds great teams. ๐ค๐ป๐๐ค๐ผ๐๐ค๐๐ค๐ฝ๐๐ค๐พ๐๐ค๐ฟ -
4-star+ RB KJ Edwards commits to Texas A&M
Joe Zura replied to Gerry Hamilton's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Just checking in on everyoneโs mental this morning to make sure yall survived? -
4-star+ RB KJ Edwards commits to Texas A&M
Realist Horn replied to Gerry Hamilton's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Early returns on Chad Scott? -
@Gerry HamiltonWe knew it was coming sooner or later, but how much does this hurt Texasโ chances? I feel like I remember you mentioning this was always the offer he was waiting for? Has miller built a strong enough relationship that still keeps Texas in this?
-
Missouri Tabs $31 Million in NIL Spending
harveycmd replied to CJ Vogel's topic in On Texas Football Forum
A school is not required to pay out the full 20.5. It's up to them. That's the max they can pay through revenue sharing. - Today
-
Missouri Tabs $31 Million in NIL Spending
Glass Joe replied to CJ Vogel's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Is the $20.5M really a compensation cap, or is it a floor? My understanding is the $20.5m is the revenue sharing amount based off the $2.8B settlement spread across P4 schools athletic departments over some number of years. It is the amount required to be provided to (โsharedโ) athletes as NIL / marketing compensation, but it does not limit athletes at any schoolโs athletes from earning amounts above the $20.5M baseline through legitimate NIL / sponsorship deals (which the schools are allowed to facilitate for the athletes). Of course, the scope here are NIL based deals, not pay for play deals. So, the $20.5m is a NIL compensation floor at a P4 school, not a compensation cap / ceiling. Disclosure of NIL deals by athletes of P4 schools goes through the new CSC process and organization. So, in theory, Mizzou can disclose they spent $31m in athlete NIL compensation by simply combining the $20.5M revenue sharing figure with the additional CSC-approved NIL deals (say, $10.5m in total). -
This weekend for Turntine is huge. All of these guys seem to love Texas but have more enticing bags elsewhere. I think Texas is patient for a reason and as many have said save their gun powder for the long run. Reading culture fits when you bring them in for a weekend or two only goes so far. Understanding who they are behind the scenes when they communicate with staff is a whole new ball game. Texas plays their cards close to the chest, so no matter how frustrated we are, we will definitely be better off than most. Let Burnt Vegetables get all his horns down out in June, same for Tickle me elko
-
ScreenRecording_06-17-2025 22-46-57_1.mov
- 1 reply
-
- 5
-
-
Missouri Tabs $31 Million in NIL Spending
BobInHouston replied to CJ Vogel's topic in On Texas Football Forum
I look at it like a salary cap. I think there will be reports and the numbers will be released. If they aren't, what's the point of saying there's a limit? On the other side of this is the clear implication that bag-dropping will resume. If Missouri is spending $31 mil before the cap, how will they have any competitive teams under $20 mil? They'll have to drop bags. All P4 teams will have to do that. And we will not find out about bag-dropping.