All Activity

I agree on the D. I think there’s one defensive score (Colin Simmons strip sack). Then I think Arch and Wingo finally connect for a long TD. But I also expect the offense to be very uneven again. Baxter gets on the board with one TD and Manning another with his legs after the defense turns UTEP over and creates a short field. Shipley gets a 40-45 yard FG. Then, Manning to McCutcheon, who makes a play in space. I think Texas is going to struggle sustaining drives again. The running game might look slightly better, but at the end of the game we are still complaining about the OL. We are going to be very fortunate that the defense gives us short fields again. The good news is that I think the offense will show minor strides forward, even if it still looks a bit messy.

Go watch his high school punt and kickoff film.He is natural return man

I'm usually blitzed by the 3rd quarter, and if it isnt going our way sooner than that🤣🤣🤣

And, somehow, Mac Jones turned into a first-round pick too lol. I still think Sark has done a great job with the offense, but the inability to put teams away the last two years with the offense needs to improve, along with the offense's failures to score against UGA and OSU the last two years. I will drink a Modelo or six for good luck

A little different eras with NIL and the portal, but I get what you're saying. They also had a first round qb in Tua, that makes a big difference when the qb is the driver of the bus.

This is the biggest item. Offense has 6 guys that you don’t really rotate, particularly when going well. As an example, Hill will be gone but Smith and Lefau will be plenty experienced. Similar for Burkes replacement. Sark had an aha moment years ago when Tech ran 100 plays. That plays a part too. It’s also different than offense because he can dictate tempo and player usage.

Offense in college football doesn't dominate like it did from say 2014-2020. Defenses have caught up by disguising looks and basically playing pass first and run second. You simply don't have championship teams putting up offensive numbers like 2019 LSU or 2020 Bama.

Get my man Golden the ball!

Of course they've come a long way. My point is that the offense has not been nearly as reliable as the defense. In 2019 Bama put up 41 on that great LSU team and dropped 52 on OSU in the national championship game. I was expecting those kinds of numbers at Texas.

Offensively, Sark is banking on Arch and future QBs playing really well. That's not a bad bet. When we add Arch to Wingo, and hopefully clean up some of the penalties, it should help open the run game more and make things more consistent. Our defense with a consistent offense that provides explosive plays will be very difficult to beat. That combo would have beaten OSU.

It was his first college football game. He will improve

Do you remember the offense of the 5-7 team? Then the 8-5 team, then both playoff teams. The personnel didn't change in either one of the playoff teams. The offensive line was more finesse than power, they didn't have a power back, and weren't good in the redzone. I wouldn't say they are a let down, just that they were maxed out and wasn't good or had the players needed to push it over the top. They're a disappointment in the sense they couldn't get it done, but IMHO I think Sark got the most of that variation of the offense.

Could we get a giveaway going associated to this? 35-7 Horns

We put a 50 burger on them. They score, but no touchdowns.

The offense is nearing the point of a being a letdown in the Sark era. Stoked our defense is what it has become, but I was amped when Sark was hired thinking we'd have the same offensive success Bama had when he ran their offense. My guess is our personnel just isn't there yet. However, I know it's stupid to expect 4 first-round receivers and a first-round RB on the same team.

They are still going to need time to develop and gel as a unit. Just because you replace a high rated player with another high rated player that doesn't mean you'll get the previous result especially if you're replacing so many.

That goes to the investment part. Recruited more high level defensive players. Forgot about Trey Moore. He'll be drafted too.

True, but our depth is special. We could have a top 10 defense next year as well. Think Saban's Alabama defenses from year to year

Winner winner chicken dinner!!! Next year with all but maybe two offensive lineman, 2 of 3 recievers, all but one TE, and the QB returning it'll be the offense shinning and the defense with questions and inconsistency.

Why are we even sure a healthy jonah williams will get the opportunity to return punts? We definitely need somebody more decisive and explosive than niblett.

Better enjoy this defense. We're losing seven to eight starter level guys: Brevard, Shaw, Burke, Hill, Gilbeau, Taaffe, Muhammed, and maybe McDonald.

The defense is more experienced and there's been more investment in the defense over the last couple of years.

I believe that the defense swaps way more personnel in and out compared to the offense. Just takes offense more legit game time to catch up.

Defense- 8 returning starters (Simmons, Guilbeau, Muhammad, McDonald, Taaffe, Lefau, Hill, Burke, Moore). Offense- 3 returning starters, two of which aren't even playing this weekend (Wisner, Moore). DJ Campbell is the only starter this weekend who also started the Ohio State game last January. It's been two games. Let it play out.

I would add more experienced depth across the board. Lots of young players trying to grow up on offense right now. But I think the rest of the factors you identified are also accurate.