Here for the Wins

A bit of an odd question, but I have my reasons. Any idea which junior high he attended?

I’m not sure to what part of my post this response pertains. If you just wanted to reiterate the point you stated, point taken. Perhaps my post wasn’t clear, but I was merely pointing out to 4th that we have a former Beaver hanging out on our 2nd team. The inference being that our 3rd team losing to OSU would not necessarily be a problem. So what you’re saying is that Sark took a shot at a dozen teams not Tech? I guess that’s better.

Well we did grab an Oregon State dude that was a starter then a backup who presumably is 2nd team for us. So maybe tap the breaks a tad.

ACC guys lack the will to win.

Brandon Weeden, Drew Henson. We haven’t seen much of this lately so maybe that’s why it feels less familiar.

Two of my favorites. If they aren’t yours, something is amiss.

They don’t want the best teams there. They never have. There are flaws around every corner of the selection process. Look a little deeper at St. Mary’s for example. Top 5 in team batting average. Their #1 starter is top 25 in terms of ERA. That’s ridiculous that the #1 overall gets that for their opener. Nice that we get a Holy Cross though. And I just watched a bit of Illinois State. Yet they’re #3 in Tallahassee. Finished 3rd in a conference/region that has never done much in the tourney. And I haven’t gotten to Schloss’s point that every conference plays 3 games series. Yet we do that differently here.

Cozart time in the 7th.

We should get those guys that have given up 16 to Troy. Maybe those that gave up to Northeastern. Welcome to college baseball.

Winning a conference title is not an automatic qualifier for all champs. See Duke. Why would those other schools schedule Tech? All 3 of those would likely be underdogs. Let’s use Duke as a comp. Do you know why Miami got the nod over them for a CFP invite? It was not conference results. You know cause Duke won the ACC. Had Duke been undefeated in non-conference they were in the CFP. Their schedule was pretty weak but the incentive to dumb down their schedule is present. It is also ridiculous to expect Tech to be the only team to have 12 P4 teams on their schedule then win a championship game. We absolutely know that it’s impossible for a team to get up for every game of season. That’s why the SEC had a late season cupcake. The list of teams incentivized to dumb down their schedule exceeds those that benefited. Vandy may be one that can look back and say we should have upgraded but keep in mind their odds of winning would decrease had they upped the non-con. Maybe Miami but they also hardly left home. Texas, Notre Dame, Duke are teams that fell short that could have had different outcomes by scheduling weaker teams under their own control. You could reason that Tech, Ole Miss and one of James Madison or Tulane (another difficult non-con loss means they’re likely out) were reinforced to not make their schedules more difficult. A&M got limited benefit from beating Notre Dame. Indianas scheduling efforts reinforced theirs. Sark commented. You know Tech would respond. Tech was talking up scheduling Texas since news broke that Texas was going SEC so it’s not as though it’s a new thing. Everybody knows including Tech we weren’t going to adjust to accommodate here. In the end, neither team has an incentive to schedule more difficult games.

25% is pretty high I’d think. It was a manual count but think 8 #2 seeds lost with 3 more two seeds tied or losing.

It was the right play. I doubt they’ll do it out of fear, but they need to beat HC with anyone but Flora. They aren’t beating us with whatever they threw today versus Volantis. We gave up double digits in exactly 3 games all season so if they give up 11 to us, they aren’t beating us. Beat HC. We beat Tarleton. They are in the same spot as if they won game 1 and lost game 2 except maybe they have Flora fresh.

There’s likely gamesmanship going on here. They know full well Texas wasn’t going to cancel. It was a virtual certainty that Tech would respond when Sark commented. Tech was in a very different place in 2017/2018. The whole college football world was as well. I was merely pointing out that Techs non-conference for this upcoming season was set in motion long ago so any critique of it should consider that. Same for Texas. CDC said we’d honor previous commitments. He was less committed to grand schedules for the future. That makes sense for all teams.

What is his brothers role at the school? He can be a real pain in the butt with Kiffin. He was a frosh against us while missing his top WR. He competed as a frosh in a big game. That’s a big deal. I think a J Daniels type season is in the cards.

They scheduled Oregon State back in 2018 as a PAC 12 school not as 2-10 school with no home. They scheduled the ACU series in 2017. SHSU was added as a replacement, which is why we played them, wasn’t it? Replacing CSU, a team we recently had on the schedule. So they are honoring their deals.