All Activity

You just wait for it pal that’s all I’m saying 🤣🤣🤣🤣

The ACC as we know it will be going away in 2031. There’s no need to consider the B12 after the few valuable schools (ASU, Utah, Colorado) leave that conference to force their way into the P2 after the ACC dissolves in 2031. So, the “FSB1” you propose above really needn’t consider the ACC nor B12 as conferences to include in it. It’ll be two conferences, and any membership from current ACC or B12 schools will be highly restrictive and selective.

I'm not arguing 🤣. I'm having a conversation.

She moves really well in that video, big time prospect!

I don’t care about Tech or what Cody Campbell is doing. I shared where I think this ends up, which is the Power 4 splitting away from the Group of 6.

So why push this if it’s going to be the same? lol this is what I meant when I said he’s creating a problem that doesn’t exist to fix something that isn’t broke just so Tech can be guaranteed as part of the future. Especially with big 12 2031 deal going to be not very good while sec and bigs continue to grow.

It's not about being pretty right now. I keep saying and we all know that Texas is replacing all but one starter on the offensive line. I'm not talking about one play, one player, one game. I'm talking improving in season and because I feel like the team is improving, the team we see now isn't the team we will see in December.

If you ever can't sleep, put on a video with Ian you'll be out in no time.

Yeah, but at the same time Texas could end up being better passing than running the ball. So the strides in pass blocking could be larger in that area. So Texas improved in that area and they just aren't as good run blocking or visa versa. We don't know which is why I'm saying instead of trying to predict or assuming let's let it happen and assess.

Every post that someone may disagree with does not require an ad hominen attack on the poster with whom you disagree. I left Inside Texas because it had become unreadable with the constant personal attacks on other posters.

You don’t even have to go there for it. Bob, CJ, and Jeff all gave OL D grades last game.

You don’t need 4 paragraphs to prove to me that Alabama is worth more than Wake Forest. I’m well aware. There obviously are steps to work out. The SEC and B1G already receive the largest shares of the pie. I see that staying the same in a new model going forward, otherwise they wouldn’t agree to any change.

Hate to promote content from other networks on here but go check out the tape review on the OL that Paul and Ian did on the IT YouTube channel. Holy moly it ain’t pretty. Not sure what Flood has been doing for five years but it hasn’t culminated in a very good product in front of Arch.

For the team to improve collectively the offense needs to become consistent in their approach whether it is run game or pass game. Doing this inherently improves the team regardless of down to down, game to game, half to half, quarter to quarter.

I honestly hope they do just line up and run by them this week a bit. Get Wingo going however you can and put up enough points to get the backups in early limiting the risk of injury to starters. The youngsters need to see live bullets too and the team needs to prove that they are capable of just lining up and embarrassing a team because we haven't seen that yet.

Bro you are arguing with a rock in hashtag he won’t quit. So he we result to calling you stupid or something wait for it 🤣

We're not even talking about the same thing anymore. I'm talking about team improving collectively in all phases. You're stuck on run game that's a different topic. I'm asking did the team improve from down to down, game to game in more areas than they didn't.

Straight facts! Great post 🤘🏾🤘🏾🤘🏾

But your identity and from what sark says in his press conferences is not viewed on game to game basis. It’s something that should be every game. Consistent run game every game is key no matter what regardless of game 1 or game 3. For instance our defense doesn’t magically do something different from game to game. They are consistent in their fundamentals and approach to the game. Yes some details may change depending on opponent but they are still consistent with their identity. Simply put being consistent on offense is vast improvement for the offense as a whole. Because the entire tenure of Sark and his offense here has been inconsistency, it’s a proven fact at this point.

🚨🚨

Sure but that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying the way I look at it is game to game, down to down, and situational. What happened in the past happened already, like the original post says, you don't stay the same you're either getting better or getting worse. If the offensive line isn't consistently pass protecting or generating push then they're not getting better. UTEP hasn't happened yet, we don't know what changes and tweaks have been made. I'm waiting to see what happens, from there I'll know if they improved.

Let me get this straight. A prominent Tech booster is doing what is best for his school. Oh. My. God.

Here is a visual for the disparity to further show why Campbell is doing this for his own self interest with tech moving forward and not the greater good of the sport. This chart stopped charting in 2023, it’s going to be worse for Big 12 moving forward as well because the data won’t include Texas and Oklahoma in the big 12 viewership numbers that clearly and unequivocally raised the big 12 overall viewership.

Texas should be able to consistently win the LOS in run game this game so if we aren’t consistently getting chunks running the ball it doesn’t matter what Sark is “trying” to do. Lack of consistent run game is why we are 1-6 vs top 5 teams under sark. If you can’t do it vs utep you won’t be able to do it when it matter imo

The issue with the approach outlined above is the wide disparity WITHIN the “FBS1” group as defined above. What do you think the individual media rights value is of (say) Wake Forest compared to Alabama? Or of Cincinnati compared to Notre Dame? Or of Kansas St compared to Texas? It’s not a stretch at all to assume the media rights of the biggest brands in the SEC and Big Ten are worth 10x - 20x some of the schools currently in the ACC or B12. For proof? Some of the current B12 schools were part of the MWC, American, or C-USA within the past decade, so that $3.5M media rights figure you cited above actually applied to current B12 schools (UH, TCU, Utah, Cincinnati, etc.). These schools didn’t suddenly become more valuable in the last decade, instead they were simply added to the B12 and got a better media deal on the coattails of Texas, OU, etc. That gravy train ends in 2031 for these schools. Further proof? SMU is paying the ACC to be a member. What does this suggest about SMU’s stand-alone media value? Stanford and Cal were bypassed by the Big Ten when they grabbed USC, UCLA, UW, and Oregon. Effectively, Stanford and Cal are viewed by the Big Ten as peers of Oregon St and Washington State. Now, they get a half share of the ACC’s value…which itself will plummet in 2031 when the biggest brands (FSU, Clemson, UNC) exit. And on and on. The hard reality is that there aren’t 64 schools that are peers in terms of economic and media value. The number is lower - somewhere between 40-48 schools. This is just like the NFL, where 32 franchises are awarded based on the concept of each franchise bringing a relatively similar market value by occupying a large MSA market. Economics of franchising 101. This allows for equal revenue sharing by NFL teams as they pool their markets / MSAs to shop for the highest media rights deals. This forms the basis of an economically equitable league, where a competitive balance is achieved amongst all 32 franchises, which itself is a key to growing the popularity of the league among fans dispersed across 50 states. There is a reason to there isn’t an NFL franchise in Boise or Des Moines or Wichita. This is where college football is heading. The same corporations (Disney, Fox, NBC, and CBS) that define the NFL economic model are the ones who signs the media checks for college football. The only thing left is to decide what is the number of franchises and where are they located to maximize the national viewership interest of major college football. In my opinion, the SEC and Big Ten will serve as the analogs to the NFC and AFC, and there won’t be a third conference in major college football. The biggest issue to resolve is how willing are the dominant revenue drivers in college football (Texas, ND, tOSU, Bama, UGA, PSU, Michigan, USC, LSU, OU, Florida, etc.) willing to share their name with other schools for the maximization of the national media rights pie for the collective whole of major college football? I’m guessing it’s 48 schools maximum, though I can see it as low as 42 schools. I’ll let the data analysts and economic modelers at Disney and Fox figure out the optimized number of schools / MSAs to maximize the media deal.