All Activity

Dan lanning is 2-0 when playing against teams who’s opposing head coaching run their mouth about his program the week prior to the game (Colorado and OK ST)😂

I'm not going to lie, I was so disappointed. I started yelling "Blake noooo, whyyy." lol.

IT’S ABOUT OUR LIVES, DON’T YOU GET IT????

Someone’s feelings are hurt that I didn’t include Oregon this week.

While there are some flashing red lights, there is a section of the fanbase that drive themselves to the verge of a heart attack or stroke. They never take a step back and look at the whole college landscape. They seem to think that to win it all you have to be the best everywhere. As if Michigan didn't just win a couple of years ago without an NFL reciever on the roster.

Perfect fit for the team known as "The Children of the Corn." Didn't like him at Baylor. Didn't know him at Temple. DON'T like him at Corn U. Otoh, the ARMY HC -- now THAT was some genuine enthusiasm in a totally appropriate context.

Yawn! Mike Gundy is at Okie State, Bill Synder at KSU. And they won more important games than Brown won at North Carolina. Greg Schiano is at Rutgers. Brown just another average coach who landed a great gig at Texas, and then could barely finish second in the South Division most years. One thing about his time at NC, second time, and Texas., his departures were the same. He was forced out.

I've actually been wondering about that. Who do you even replace someone like Sark with, if he does go to the NFL like some people suspect he wants to. That's always tough to do, huh? I'm not really in the know when it comes to good coaches and all that, except the obvious ones out there.

We should have kept Jaray Bledsoe instead of Colin Simmons. We should fire Sark and re-hire Tom Herman because clearly our d-line is failing the pee test. We should merge with OU so that we can have a Venables-coached defense. We should just quit football altogether because Arch isn’t already an NFL hall of famer by now.

As long as CDC and Eltife are here, I doubt a 13 year down period like that ever happens again. If Sark does bolt for the NFL in a few years, I trust they will find the right guy to keep this thing humming. Keep the program at an Ohio State level where a down year is a 10-2 regular season and you’re winning a natty at least once a decade.

Or this guy

Sincerely, Hashtag

Just to be serious for a second, I would like to see a bit more out of our pass rush, considering how talented that room is. Even with a vanilla defense, we should still have been all over SJSU, sack wise. We'll see moving forward but I'm expecting big things from that group this year. Simmons needs to stop trying to do too much and just go with the flow.

I love that Schloss has gone hard on Pitchers this time around. He's determined not to be short handed this year. I think he'll make a playoff run this time, but that's just my uneducated two cents.

Also, I agree with everyone about Steve Patterson, that guy ruined a lot. No mistaking that. But you can't deny that while Mack had some great seasons, he did under perform, for his talent level, etc. Though Mack was never a great X's and O's guy, he was a good leader and program builder at Texas. I'm not sure Saban would've made much of a difference with the leadership around Texas at that point. I'm hoping that we're determined to NEVER let it get to that point again.

After that Natty loss to Bama, he was never really the same, for some reason. But we're always thankful for him for that 2005 title and recruiting Vince Young. Though he could've definitely had a few more under his belt before that, imo. Either way, I'm fine with him hanging around. Although if he starts talking about coaching again...lol.

Ever since Mack had to try and worm his way back in things are getting weird. Damn Mack karma🤣. Topped off today with Sark's weird bathroom analogy which is viral all over now. Just go back to NC til after football is over please, and help Sally make cookies for BB and his girl Jordan🙏

The committee was enamored with Patterson’s presentation and how he ran pro organizations. They felt that was the way colleges sports would be going and wanted to be ahead of the curve. (Man, were they wrong) Luck was a shoe in until then. Patterson would have preferred to keep Brown, although you are right that he was willing to pull the trigger if needed. But that wasn’t the reason for the hire. Luck would have pulled the trigger too if he was told to. 100% agree that leadership was lacking from multiple positions at the time and DeLoss had a part in it, although he wanted Luck not Patterson. Powers was a major liability in all of it. My major point is that these decisions, especially Patterson were the biggest reasons for our decade of mediocrity, not Mack Brown. Patterson interviewed coaches that had used every connection they had to get the Texas job and they walked away after talking to him. Multiple coaches. It was that bad, but people really want to think Nick Saban was going to leave Alabama to come into that situation.

Thanks for posting here @DirectorsCupUpdates🤘

That’s nothing like Muschamp, absolutely nothing. Muschamp is a Saban clone and would’ve been F bombs galore and have you ready to run through a wall.

Very Muschamp esq, that's fire. Nothing wrong with wanting your team to have a killer instinct. Put games away with authority, force the fear into them.

What is the Director's Cup? The Director's Cup is an award presented to the collegiate athletic department that achieves the highest level of success across a variety of sports, both men's and women's, during the academic year. Points are awarded, from 5-100 points, based on each teams placement in the NCAA sponsored championship competition for each sport. Failure to be included in the NCAA sponsored championship competition equates to 0 points score. The champion in each sport is awarded 100 points and the points beyond that vary based on the size of the bracket or number of teams included in the competition. Each school can include points scored by 19 different teams, regardless of gender. 5 of the 19 teams included must be Volleyball, W Soccer, W Basketball, M Basketball and Baseball. After those 5 sports are included, the next highest 14 scores are used to determine the final score. History The Director's Cup was started in the 93-94 season by USA Today and the National Association of Collegiate Directors of Athletics (NACDA) and continues with these relationships today with the addition of Learfield as a corporate sponsor. In the inaugural season, The University of North Carolina won the cup while Stanford finished in 2nd place. Stanford would then go on to win the next 25 Director's Cup until Texas won their first during the 20-21 season. Texas would win a second cup during the 21-22 season with Stanford winning by a thin margin in 22-23. Texas has since gone back to back once again winning the Cup in 23-24 and 24-25. The original scoring system differed from the one described above. For the first 25 years schools could include points from their top 10 men's sports and top 10 women's sports which would be added together to give the grand total score. This system made it very challenging for schools with smaller departments, including Texas, to outright win the cup. In 1993 Texas had 9 Men's sports and 8 Women's Sports. In the early 2000s sports like W Soccer, Rowing and Softball had been added on the Women's side but Texas still did not field 10 Men's teams. The scoring system was changed to the current system for the 2017-18 season and the move away from gender specific scoring, decreasing the number of sports from 20 to 19 and adding required sports has made the cup more competitive (at least slightly). Texas would have won only 1 Director's Cup under the old scoring system.

Got a couple others last week too right?

I don’t know when but we’re going to win a championship with Schloss here and maybe several.