All Activity

@Gerry Hamilton you see the jump of Andrej?

It’s a football site. No one is attacking anyone. Well, some were close with Zura for no reason but the larger point remains. Disagreeing with someone’s perspective or opinion happens on a sports site. Of course I’m going to poke at what film study have you done? I’m almost obligated to but my original reply literally had its not personal in it. I think it’s past time to move on from flood but I’m really happy to throw some crow down my gullet. I want him to be successful because then our team is. Just offseason fodder. You as well 🙏🏽

😶

Muschamp will have teams punt the ball quicker. Offense will be on the field more often and increase TOP. Sometimes the defense would not allow any points on a drive, yet still be out there for 3-4 minutes of game time from getting teams to 3rd down repeatedly and converting slowly down the field

Jury is still out on this one. We can't knock him for 1 bad season but I'm a little skeptical when everyone was begging for him to switch Hutson to LG and Robertson to C for most of the season last year.

I would venture out to say... yes. Yes indeed.

wonder if my Mickey Mantle cards are worth anyything nowadays?

Thank goodness he has then thunder thighs! So happy he is ok and hopefully this is just a bump in the road.

God is good

Great to see this update on Missouri RB Ahmad Hardy.

Seems light for a safety but hopefully this is legit interest. Assume he will need to bump one of those 5 OVs for us

I got this Bijan to 50 future 15 recently

I do think T.O.P. is a strong indicator of whether or not your trenches are dominant on both sides of the football. It won't dictate whether or not you win/lose games, but I do think it showcases the ability for teams to win at the line of scrimmage more times than not. I was very surprised to see Notre Dame as low on the T.O.P. rankings as they were given their running game and ability to beat teams up front.

Absolutely haha

Another way to look at that data is 5 of the teams on the bottom of your list were all ranked in the top 12 of the final CFB Rankings last season. That’s 43% (5 of the top 12) ranked teams were outside the top 75 in time of possession. Tech, OU, Notre Dame, Texas, and Ole Miss. 3 of those 5 teams (25%) made the Playoffs, and the other 2 teams were the first out (ND, Texas). And North Texas would’ve made the Playoffs too if they’d beaten Tulane in the AAC CG. Personally, I don’t think time of possession is a terribly relevant offensive statistic any longer in modern college football. It’s the flip side of many of the advanced offensive efficiency metrics. If you can score points while requiring fewer offensive plays to do so, that’s a more efficient offense. That said, I DO think time of possession can be an indicative stat for defense (counter intuitively) as the more snaps your defense faces on the field, the more likely the opposing teams are to eventually score points. Of course, ND, OU, and Tech all had top defenses last season, so T.O.P. isn’t revealing defensive fatigue either.

I dont know when to sell. Me no smart.

Oh man that's awesome. Update us how that goes.

I'm impressed you've hung on to them for so long.

That's nasty!

Friend of mine one got this signed at the Belton show last weekend for me. It was a PSA 10 crackout. Going back to PSA for dual service. Hoping for a PSA 9 Auto 10 🤘🏼🤞🏼

An improved offensive line and run game should certainly help this case. 2025: Texas ranked 109th (28:29.92) 2024: Texas ranked 74th (29:51.63) 2023: Texas ranked 36th (31:13.14) 2022: Texas ranked 120th (27:18.62) 2021: Texas ranked 110th (28:05.67)

That doesn’t surprise me given the offensive inefficiency in the first half of the season and PK’s bend don’t break defense. I would expect better this year although the schedule will play a role in dictating that.

Here are two recent Arch pick ups.

One day LaMelo will figure it out and I'll be rich!

Had to get that thing in a one touch immediately lol