All Activity

Yes this I agree with. I included all 4 conferences in the original FBS1 talk track as a handful of programs in the ACC and Big 12 will be selected to make their way over and how else do we reference them than by their current name.

its an interesting theory how much a position group can improve vs how much latent talent they have. On one hand you have five star generational LTs like Banks that didn’t take long at all to lock in and then you have players that are just never going to be talented enough to meet a championship level standard no matter how much coaching is involved. And then there are the inbetweens. One can hope we have the latent talent along the OL that can become championship level standard but a few of the dudes like DJ and Neto have been around long enough that I think we know their upside.

You just wait for it pal that’s all I’m saying 🤣🤣🤣🤣

The ACC as we know it will be going away in 2031. There’s no need to consider the B12 after the few valuable schools (ASU, Utah, Colorado) leave that conference to force their way into the P2 after the ACC dissolves in 2031. So, the “FSB1” you propose above really needn’t consider the ACC nor B12 as conferences to include in it. It’ll be two conferences, and any membership from current ACC or B12 schools will be highly restrictive and selective.

I'm not arguing 🤣. I'm having a conversation.

She moves really well in that video, big time prospect!

I don’t care about Tech or what Cody Campbell is doing. I shared where I think this ends up, which is the Power 4 splitting away from the Group of 6.

So why push this if it’s going to be the same? lol this is what I meant when I said he’s creating a problem that doesn’t exist to fix something that isn’t broke just so Tech can be guaranteed as part of the future. Especially with big 12 2031 deal going to be not very good while sec and bigs continue to grow.

It's not about being pretty right now. I keep saying and we all know that Texas is replacing all but one starter on the offensive line. I'm not talking about one play, one player, one game. I'm talking improving in season and because I feel like the team is improving, the team we see now isn't the team we will see in December.

If you ever can't sleep, put on a video with Ian you'll be out in no time.

Yeah, but at the same time Texas could end up being better passing than running the ball. So the strides in pass blocking could be larger in that area. So Texas improved in that area and they just aren't as good run blocking or visa versa. We don't know which is why I'm saying instead of trying to predict or assuming let's let it happen and assess.

Every post that someone may disagree with does not require an ad hominen attack on the poster with whom you disagree. I left Inside Texas because it had become unreadable with the constant personal attacks on other posters.

You don’t even have to go there for it. Bob, CJ, and Jeff all gave OL D grades last game.

You don’t need 4 paragraphs to prove to me that Alabama is worth more than Wake Forest. I’m well aware. There obviously are steps to work out. The SEC and B1G already receive the largest shares of the pie. I see that staying the same in a new model going forward, otherwise they wouldn’t agree to any change.

Hate to promote content from other networks on here but go check out the tape review on the OL that Paul and Ian did on the IT YouTube channel. Holy moly it ain’t pretty. Not sure what Flood has been doing for five years but it hasn’t culminated in a very good product in front of Arch.

For the team to improve collectively the offense needs to become consistent in their approach whether it is run game or pass game. Doing this inherently improves the team regardless of down to down, game to game, half to half, quarter to quarter.

I honestly hope they do just line up and run by them this week a bit. Get Wingo going however you can and put up enough points to get the backups in early limiting the risk of injury to starters. The youngsters need to see live bullets too and the team needs to prove that they are capable of just lining up and embarrassing a team because we haven't seen that yet.

Bro you are arguing with a rock in hashtag he won’t quit. So he we result to calling you stupid or something wait for it 🤣

We're not even talking about the same thing anymore. I'm talking about team improving collectively in all phases. You're stuck on run game that's a different topic. I'm asking did the team improve from down to down, game to game in more areas than they didn't.

Straight facts! Great post 🤘🏾🤘🏾🤘🏾

But your identity and from what sark says in his press conferences is not viewed on game to game basis. It’s something that should be every game. Consistent run game every game is key no matter what regardless of game 1 or game 3. For instance our defense doesn’t magically do something different from game to game. They are consistent in their fundamentals and approach to the game. Yes some details may change depending on opponent but they are still consistent with their identity. Simply put being consistent on offense is vast improvement for the offense as a whole. Because the entire tenure of Sark and his offense here has been inconsistency, it’s a proven fact at this point.

🚨🚨

Sure but that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying the way I look at it is game to game, down to down, and situational. What happened in the past happened already, like the original post says, you don't stay the same you're either getting better or getting worse. If the offensive line isn't consistently pass protecting or generating push then they're not getting better. UTEP hasn't happened yet, we don't know what changes and tweaks have been made. I'm waiting to see what happens, from there I'll know if they improved.

Let me get this straight. A prominent Tech booster is doing what is best for his school. Oh. My. God.

Here is a visual for the disparity to further show why Campbell is doing this for his own self interest with tech moving forward and not the greater good of the sport. This chart stopped charting in 2023, it’s going to be worse for Big 12 moving forward as well because the data won’t include Texas and Oklahoma in the big 12 viewership numbers that clearly and unequivocally raised the big 12 overall viewership.