NothinButDaHorns34 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago This should hopefully be a fun portal season this year. Hoping sark goes all in for possibly arch’s last season. 2 Quote
Rocky P Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago @CJ Vogel do you see Texas going after LSU WR or RB that enterend the portal? Think it was Bullett and Dunham 1 Quote
Steamboat Willie Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago #1 Interior OL: Every G/C with a heartbeat should be on the board. C + LG have been a weekly horror show. Do what we did at DL last year: 2 real starters, 1–2 developmental guys, move on. #2 RB: If Baugh hits the portal, that’s the whole meeting. Lacy too. We don’t need another “nice rotational back” after what we just watched—go get a bellcow or stand pat. #3 WR (only if it’s real): Not spending big NIL on “slightly better Mosley” types when OL is on fire. If we pay at WR, make it speed or a true WR1, not another Wingo cousin. Everything else: 1 ILB, 1 vet CB, maybe a blocking TE—cool, after the above is handled. Those are sides. The meal is OL + RB. Portal tampering already started, the rules are decorative, and chaos is the only constant. Buckle up. 5 Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted 1 hour ago Moderators Posted 1 hour ago 17 minutes ago, Rocky P said: @CJ Vogel do you see Texas going after LSU WR or RB that enterend the portal? Think it was Bullett and Dunham Durham was fake, or the one from this morning. 1 Quote
Moderators CJ Vogel Posted 1 hour ago Author Moderators Posted 1 hour ago 21 minutes ago, Rocky P said: @CJ Vogel do you see Texas going after LSU WR or RB that enterend the portal? Think it was Bullett and Dunham Durham has not entered the portal, and I don't really expect him to at the moment. 1 Quote
Beard N Balls Bundle Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 53 minutes ago, Bunk Moreland said: He’s really good, but if the top 5-7 WRs all return and Royal reclassifies to 26 and enters with Bishop, would Texas still take a big-time receiver out of the portal? Seems like that would create the potential for major attrition. Not saying it’s a bad thing—I think Sark NEEDS to upgrade at receiver—just wondering what it all means for the receiver room dominoes. It's been stated multiple times by the mods that there is no indication of royal reclassifying as of now 2 Quote
Beard N Balls Bundle Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 31 minutes ago, Steamboat Willie said: CJ, positionally speaking, where do you think Texas will emphasize most in the portal this cycle — and which spots are now clear must-add versus luxury adds? Not CJ but definitely OL 1 Quote
Moderators CJ Vogel Posted 1 hour ago Author Moderators Posted 1 hour ago 35 minutes ago, Steamboat Willie said: CJ, positionally speaking, where do you think Texas will emphasize most in the portal this cycle — and which spots are now clear must-add versus luxury adds? Offensive line. 3 Quote
pinkman_90 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 12 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said: Durham has not entered the portal, and I don't really expect him to at the moment. Wouldn’t really want Durham tbh. He looks to have not maintained his speed while adding weight. Speed was his elite trait. Idk maybe that’s something that can be fixed but not a sure thing. 1 Quote
GDI Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 3 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said: Offensive line. Is Cruz going to be a player? He seems like a mystery man, not much written about him. 1 Quote
FootLaw Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 1 hour ago, CJ Vogel said: Good ballplayer. Not a great tackler,however. This is an interesting one. Dude is top 10 in FBS solo tackles this season (61). Eck and Lampron are good options for a one-year SR LB but they have to enter. I'm curious to see if Chambliss enters from SDSU. RS Jr. from Cali that started at Utah (played 4 games) then went to SDSU. 6'3 230lb 106 tackles (61 solo) 9.5 TFL 4 sacks. 56 minutes ago, 901longhorn said: Here ya go CJ That's a big WR right there. Didn't take long for a good one to hop in. 1 Quote
Beard N Balls Bundle Posted 50 minutes ago Posted 50 minutes ago 14 minutes ago, GDI said: Is Cruz going to be a player? He seems like a mystery man, not much written about him. Gerry has aid that the staff really likes Cruz, but he may need another year to develop. He will most likely compete for the job next year though Quote
Rocky P Posted 49 minutes ago Posted 49 minutes ago 34 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said: Durham was fake, or the one from this morning. figured since Fawcett announced it, it's true. 1 Quote
Tres Comas Posted 43 minutes ago Posted 43 minutes ago Unless we’re expecting another year of zero contribution from this year’s Freshman I don’t see spending on WR unless it was someone special that gave us something we didn’t have. Taking a high dollar WR would beg the question what the hell happened with the last WR class? Poor evaluation, poor development or both? Quote
TexasFanatic Posted 36 minutes ago Posted 36 minutes ago 6 minutes ago, Tres Comas said: Unless we’re expecting another year of zero contribution from this year’s Freshman I don’t see spending on WR unless it was someone special that gave us something we didn’t have. Taking a high dollar WR would beg the question what the hell happened with the last WR class? Poor evaluation, poor development or both? Staff here said they expect big adds and some attrition at WR. CJ said to watch for Ffrench Our WRs are good but we likely need a true number 1 Quote
TexasDynasty3 Posted 34 minutes ago Posted 34 minutes ago Don’t need 2 redundant receivers. Pass on Marsh. Need a speed demon. Quote
TexasFanatic Posted 34 minutes ago Posted 34 minutes ago Just now, TexasDynasty3 said: Don’t need 2 redundant receivers. Pass on Marsh. Need a speed demon. Who is he redundant to? Quote
bgreen04 Posted 29 minutes ago Posted 29 minutes ago 3 minutes ago, TexasFanatic said: Who is he redundant to? Mosely and really Wingo/Livingstone too all 6"3 big targets with decent hands. Quote
TexasFanatic Posted 27 minutes ago Posted 27 minutes ago 1 minute ago, bgreen04 said: Mosely and really Wingo/Livingstone too all 6"3 big targets with decent hands. Cam Coleman is that . He would technically be redundant. Marsh is a good player and I think on Par with Wingo. Wingo doesn’t play big. Quote
GoHorns1 Posted 23 minutes ago Posted 23 minutes ago 11 minutes ago, TexasFanatic said: Staff here said they expect big adds and some attrition at WR. CJ said to watch for Ffrench Our WRs are good but we likely need a true number 1 Mosley is our #1 WR after overcoming injuries Quote
GoHorns1 Posted 22 minutes ago Posted 22 minutes ago 4 minutes ago, TexasFanatic said: Cam Coleman is that . He would technically be redundant. Marsh is a good player and I think on Par with Wingo. Wingo doesn’t play big. Mosley has excellent hands Quote
GoHorns1 Posted 21 minutes ago Posted 21 minutes ago 7 minutes ago, bgreen04 said: Mosely and really Wingo/Livingstone too all 6"3 big targets with decent hands. Mosley has excellent hands Quote
Tres Comas Posted 20 minutes ago Posted 20 minutes ago 14 minutes ago, TexasFanatic said: Staff here said they expect big adds and some attrition at WR. CJ said to watch for Ffrench Our WRs are good but we likely need a true number 1 I’m not disagreeing if there will be attrition but it still begs the question regarding that class on evals and development. A lot of money frozen on the sideline. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.