Thanos72 Posted yesterday at 01:18 PM Posted yesterday at 01:18 PM We were a solid guard away from having a good enough line. Arch needed game experiences for sure but we beat FL and probably OSU with a better left guard alone. Defense didn’t show up for fl or we win. I think Muschamp solves that. My point is we weren’t that far away and if we had snuck in, we had a chance to catch fire since no team is elite or flawless. Some of yall are acting like we are doomed or have scrubs. We’d be very good with no additions with the exception of guard unless a couple in the room stand up. We’re looking for difference makers to clear the way not salvage the day. 3 1 Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted yesterday at 01:22 PM Author Moderators Posted yesterday at 01:22 PM Just now, Thanos72 said: We were a solid guard away from having a good enough line. Arch needed game experiences for sure but we beat FL and probably OSU with a better left guard alone. Defense didn’t show up for fl or we win. I think Muschamp solves that. My point is we weren’t that far away and if we had snuck in, we had a chance to catch fire since no team is elite or flawless. Some of yall are acting like we are doomed or have scrubs. We’d be very good with no additions with the exception of guard unless a couple in the room stand up. We’re looking for difference makers to clear the way not salvage the day. Yep. Texas will add some good parts, while also not getting them all. I am concerned about LB in Muschamp's scheme if Alliegro opts for Ohio State and something doesn't end with a Texas commit by Uluave. For his scheme to maximize, he has to get what he needs at LB. Biggest thing for me is team discipline. There is no way Texas can finish 130 in penalties and win anything of true meaning next year. That just shrinks the margin for error too much. 12 Quote
DrunkBevo Posted yesterday at 01:27 PM Posted yesterday at 01:27 PM (edited) 5 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said: Yep. Texas will add some good parts, while also not getting them all. I am concerned about LB in Muschamp's scheme if Alliegro opts for Ohio State and something doesn't end with a Texas commit by Uluave. For his scheme to maximize, he has to get what he needs at LB. Biggest thing for me is team discipline. There is no way Texas can finish 130 in penalties and win anything of true meaning next year. That just shrinks the margin for error too much. We better do something with our oline coach if we want penalties fixed. If he stays expect that number to continue to be high. Him staying and expecting something miraculous to happen with penalties is not reality Edited yesterday at 01:28 PM by DrunkBevo Quote
GDI Posted yesterday at 01:33 PM Posted yesterday at 01:33 PM I'm going out on a limb here and predicting no $1.00 month special subscription next year. 1 4 Quote
sarkneedsaplaycaller Posted yesterday at 04:08 PM Posted yesterday at 04:08 PM 2 hours ago, Gerry Hamilton said: Yep. Texas will add some good parts, while also not getting them all. I am concerned about LB in Muschamp's scheme if Alliegro opts for Ohio State and something doesn't end with a Texas commit by Uluave. For his scheme to maximize, he has to get what he needs at LB. Biggest thing for me is team discipline. There is no way Texas can finish 130 in penalties and win anything of true meaning next year. That just shrinks the margin for error too much. If Sark is still here don't expect discipline to change. Has been an issue since day 1. Quote
Hookem72 Posted yesterday at 04:10 PM Posted yesterday at 04:10 PM 2 hours ago, GDI said: I'm going out on a limb here and predicting no $1.00 month special subscription next year. Well. If their goal was to retain some and grow market awareness, it worked. Probably the best time to do it instead of when there are lulls in the season. Quote
MarMar2001 Posted yesterday at 04:16 PM Posted yesterday at 04:16 PM 11 hours ago, Gerry Hamilton said: Stud, yes. Playing speed and strike ability Future NFL LB https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fy41PC3i8hg I don’t know if this was answered already but do you think the staff would take both linebackers or are they just looking to take one? Quote
AZ Longhorn Posted yesterday at 04:59 PM Posted yesterday at 04:59 PM 3 hours ago, Gerry Hamilton said: Yep. Texas will add some good parts, while also not getting them all. I am concerned about LB in Muschamp's scheme if Alliegro opts for Ohio State and something doesn't end with a Texas commit by Uluave. For his scheme to maximize, he has to get what he needs at LB. Biggest thing for me is team discipline. There is no way Texas can finish 130 in penalties and win anything of true meaning next year. That just shrinks the margin for error too much. "Muschamp needs his press man corners" and "Muschamp needs two-plus over the ball guys" and "Muschamp needs his physical safety" and "Muschamp needs another game-changing EDGE" and "Muschamp needs two new LBs"... I am worn out haha. Wish I'd just understood earlier that he only likes 5-10 guys on the whole defensive roster 😅 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.