Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Assistant Regional Manager said:

Lol at you people trying to call out Gerry last Saturday, actually believing that Smith had the "flu"

😂😂 This aged beautifully.

Last week: “Lots of assumptions and jumping to unfounded conclusions. How about we let it play out?”

Now that it played out: “Lol at you people who believed the flu.”

You really do have an impressive ability to be 100% confident in whichever position became correct AFTER the information came out. 😂

Posted
5 minutes ago, TexasLonghorns said:

😂😂 This aged beautifully.

Last week: “Lots of assumptions and jumping to unfounded conclusions. How about we let it play out?”

Now that it played out: “Lol at you people who believed the flu.”

You really do have an impressive ability to be 100% confident in whichever position became correct AFTER the information came out. 😂

Phogster! Knew we could count on you to be in this thread since it is negative news.

You think the Chiefs get that dub against the Bucs tomorrow?

Posted
1 hour ago, Assistant Regional Manager said:

Lol at you people trying to call out Gerry last Saturday, actually believing that Smith had the "flu"

You’re the same person who responded to the following post on Gerrys reporting. You spend the first half of the story telling everyone they’re wrong for speculating, then once the facts come out, you act like you knew all along. Elite hindsight.


-Is he about to Cook us?

-Rip to our LB depth time to get Atkinson sped up

-Depth just got a whole lot worse.

-Yikes

-I thought I read in the past day or two that he had one of his best practices?

-I don’t want to be too quick to judge because I could be completely wrong but could he maybe not be taking the Muschamp harping well?

-I’m here for the writing. I stay for the community optimism…

-Not good

-Not good and I had this in the back of my mind about how he might be feeling. If you deserve to start you should deserve to start. Nothing should be a given. This is why I believe Mack failed so frequently early on. He gave priority to favorites and tenured players. And I say that wishing he'll stay because he has played so well and still has so much upside.

-And this is your reply to those post. 

Assistant- “Lots of assumptions and jumping to unfounded conclusions. How about we let it play out?”

Posted
3 minutes ago, Assistant Regional Manager said:

Phogster! Knew we could count on you to be in this thread since it is negative news.

You think the Chiefs get that dub against the Bucs tomorrow?

😂 Look at that… straight to changing the subject.

Last week: “Lots of assumptions and jumping to unfounded conclusions. How about we let it play out?”

Today: Smith is gone.

And now suddenly we’re talking Chiefs football. 

I’ll let you get back to waiting for the next development so you can explain why you knew it all along. He doesn’t predict outcomes, he waits for the outcome, then positions himself on the winning side. Hahaha, hilarious! 

Posted
1 minute ago, hookemrj13 said:

I just wonder what the personal issue is that the team is not willing to work it out...

Assuming this is not about playtime..

I’m sure Sark and the staff were wanting him to stay. Losing an experienced player less than 3 weeks from the 1st game on not ideal. 

Posted
1 minute ago, TexasLonghorns said:

You’re the same person who responded to the following post on Gerrys reporting. You spend the first half of the story telling everyone they’re wrong for speculating, then once the facts come out, you act like you knew all along. Elite hindsight.


-Is he about to Cook us?

-Rip to our LB depth time to get Atkinson sped up

-Depth just got a whole lot worse.

-Yikes

-I thought I read in the past day or two that he had one of his best practices?

-I don’t want to be too quick to judge because I could be completely wrong but could he maybe not be taking the Muschamp harping well?

-I’m here for the writing. I stay for the community optimism…

-Not good

-Not good and I had this in the back of my mind about how he might be feeling. If you deserve to start you should deserve to start. Nothing should be a given. This is why I believe Mack failed so frequently early on. He gave priority to favorites and tenured players. And I say that wishing he'll stay because he has played so well and still has so much upside.

-And this is your reply to those post. 

Assistant- “Lots of assumptions and jumping to unfounded conclusions. How about we let it play out?”

You have no idea who you are talking to.

I was responding to the bozos who were speculating he didn’t want to compete for playing time and was scared of competition.

That was never the case.

Posted
2 minutes ago, UTexas said:

I’m sure Sark and the staff were wanting him to stay. Losing an experienced player less than 3 weeks from the 1st game on not ideal. 

 

Hamilton said in the pinned thread he did not make the choice to leave. So yeah he was told. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.