Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

If you go on any of their boards, the claim it is because BV insists on running very physical practices at all times. Evidently, even during their bye week. So, yes, OU did in fact LOSE the bye week too according to their injury report!🤷‍♂️

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Hank South said:

S&C issue would be my first thought. 

I don't think so, my ex bro in law is S&C coach there. He is really elite, was head S&C coach for Nebraska for years. Venables hold extremely tough practices! Know that for a fact.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted

"Are they sand bagging the reports?" is the question I'd raise.

What percentage of their listed "OUT" and "Doubtful" guys end up seeing the field?  Same with "Questionable".

If their percentages are not out of lane line (Lane K listed 26 guys as 'Doubtful' once, just fecking with the SEC suits) then I'm OK with it.  Maybe they just have a lot of injuries, blamed on things listed above?

But if they have a high percentage of miraculous recoveries of the "doubtful" and "questionable" then that could be evidence they are trying to throw off their opponents.

Posted
3 hours ago, Hank South said:

S&C issue would be my first thought. 

I think Venebles is lowkey a “let’s practice physically hard” psycho when things go bad. Per a sooner site a subscribed too (this week has been beautiful) he let the defense have at it against the offense on Tuesday. His answer to preparing the offense for Texas was to let them practice against the defense with full force. Hence some of the players appearing on the injury report. I understand toughening up your team, but damn aren’t you wearing them out ahead of time as well. It’s time for Texas to kill.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, Roysterr said:

I don't think so, my ex bro in law is S&C coach there. He is really elite, was head S&C coach for Nebraska for years. Venables hold extremely tough practices! Know that for a fact.

Was it Tom Osborne’s Nebraska? 

Posted
46 minutes ago, ArizonaLonghorn said:

"Are they sand bagging the reports?" is the question I'd raise.

What percentage of their listed "OUT" and "Doubtful" guys end up seeing the field?  Same with "Questionable".

If their percentages are not out of lane line (Lane K listed 26 guys as 'Doubtful' once, just fecking with the SEC suits) then I'm OK with it.  Maybe they just have a lot of injuries, blamed on things listed above?

But if they have a high percentage of miraculous recoveries of the "doubtful" and "questionable" then that could be evidence they are trying to throw off their opponents.

That’s not Brent’s forte. He expects guys to play through pain if they can. See Kip Lewis, and David Stone’s dislocated knee.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.