Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Could be… but TE doesn’t seem like the highest priority position with what we have. Washington, Townsend and Watson with Endries and others… stacked. The big blocking TE might be the way to go if our oline is a little smaller than expected.

Posted
Just now, James Bianchetta said:

No. Georgia is selling him as an “offensive weapon”, an X receiver, slot receiver, or tight end. Kent isn’t even close to the level that Prothro is, receiving wise. Also, Prothro is a done deal to UGA.

Kent is the ideal in line, Hback, TE that Sark likes and uses a lot.

  • Hook 'Em 2
Posted
26 minutes ago, drag worm said:

Kirby has built a juggernaut off TEs, RBs and Front 7. 

Has he though at TE? Besides Bowers who else? Washington was all hype and is now I think 3rd or 4th on the Steelers depth chart. Anyone else I’m missing?

  • Haha 1
Posted

I honestly think it’s better news if for some reason things go sideways between Bowman and USC before December. I know the mods have said he’s locked in but USC deals have fallen through in the past. If that happens again, Texas would be in the driver seat.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, NotGerryHamilton said:

Has he though at TE? Besides Bowers who else? Washington was all hype and is now I think 3rd or 4th on the Steelers depth chart. Anyone else I’m missing?


“Besides Bowers” lol.

But historically: 

Randy McMichael

Orson Charles

Leonard Pope

Ben Watson

Larry Brown

Shan Mitchell

Young one on campus named Elyss. 6’8.

And then

https://x.com/radinabulsi/status/1941160749386363261?s=42

Edited by drag worm
Posted
1 hour ago, NotGerryHamilton said:

Has he though at TE? Besides Bowers who else? Washington was all hype and is now I think 3rd or 4th on the Steelers depth chart. Anyone else I’m missing?

Kirby era:

Bowers (2 rings) 

Darnell (2 rings) 

Woerner

Nauta

Delp now

Luckie now

Posted
57 minutes ago, drag worm said:

Kirby era:

Bowers (2 rings) 

Darnell (2 rings) 

Woerner

Nauta

Delp now

Luckie now

I thought you meant developed good NFL TEs. And only Bowers has been good. The others are back ups or back ups back ups. But if you’re talking strictly college success then yes he has. 

Posted
20 minutes ago, NotGerryHamilton said:

I thought you meant developed good NFL TEs. And only Bowers has been good. The others are back ups or back ups back ups. But if you’re talking strictly college success then yes he has. 

Didn’t say anything about the NFL.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.