Jump to content
  • AUSTIN, Texas — There was a method to Steve Sarkisian’s madness when the Texas coach embarked on a mission to challenge Malik Muhammad ahead of the team’s second camp scrimmage.

    “I purposely went after him with a couple of different things,” Sarkisian said after the scrimmage. “For him to play the way that he played gave me more confidence than I've had, and I have a lot in him. Today was very, very encouraging on that front.”

    Muhammad, a veteran cornerback with 18 starts in 30 career games, will begin the 2025 season with arguably the toughest assignment he’ll face as a junior whenever he has to cover Ohio State’s Jeremiah Smith. Smith was limited to one reception for three yards on Jan. 10, when the Buckeyes’ 28-14 triumph in the Cotton Bowl ended the Longhorns’ season one game shy of the College Football Playoff National Championship.

    “It was a team effort,” Muhammad said earlier in camp about what it took for Texas to hold Smith to his lowest statistical output and his lowest single-game grade from Pro Football Focus during his remarkable true freshman season.

    The Longhorns had Smith’s number in Arlington. Still, Sarkisian, who didn’t mention Smith or any other Ohio State wide receivers by name while detailing what Muhammad went through last week, knows coach Ryan Day and offensive coordinator Brian Hartline will be looking to get the 6-foot-3-inch, 223-pound Smith (76 receptions 1,315 yards and 15 touchdowns, which established new freshman records for a Buckeye) involved early and often.

    The occasions when Muhammad finds himself one-on-one with Smith should be few and far between.

    That’s not a knock on the 6-foot, 188-pound Muhammad, who Pro Football Focus touts as the sixth-best returning cornerback in the country. Texas should do whatever it takes to limit the times Smith faces man coverage because he destroyed opponents in those situations last season.

    According to PFF, Smith’s 90.6 grade against man coverage was second among FBS wide receivers (minimum of 13 targets), recording 25 receptions for 384 yards and four touchdowns on 32 targets with a near-perfect NFL passer rating when targeted (156.3). Smith also averaged 4.09 yards per route run (sixth in FBS) with an average depth of target of 11.1 yards, indicating that if Will Howard could correctly identify that Smith was facing man coverage, the nation’s No. 1-ranked recruit in 2024 would be turned loose, and Ohio State could hunt chunk-yardage plays (Smith caught 12 passes last season that traveled 20 yards or more down the field, racking up 467 yards and scoring four touchdowns, recording a near-perfect PFF grade of 99.9 when targeted on deep throws).

    Julian Sayin, who was named Ohio State’s starting quarterback on Monday, shouldn’t be expected to decipher what Pete Kwiatkowski is throwing at him in his first career start. Nevertheless, it remains to be seen how much Kwiatkowski and Duane Akina alternate between playing man and zone in the opener.

    That has more to do with trusting the communication that the secondary has worked to rebuild in the wake of losing Jahdae Barron and Andrew Mukuba than anything else. At the same time, an effective pass rush could make life on the back end much more manageable if the Longhorns can routinely pressure Sayin.

    Although Smith was good last season against zone, catching 43 passes for 783 yards and nine touchdowns, shading coverage to his side of the field and devoting more resources to him, in general, is the path of least resistance.

    Elevated to the No. 2 wide receiver, with Emeka Egbuka out of eligibility, Carnell Tate was much better against zone last season (a season-long PFF grade of 73.7) than when working against man coverage (59.1). While it’s risky for Texas to let its defensive backs handle Tate, Brandon Inniss and the other Buckeye receiving threats more often in one-on-one situations, Muhammad and the other Longhorn defensive backs should be ready for what they’ll see inside the Horseshoe in 12 days.

    • Hook 'Em 24

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    2 hours ago, HookemHorns said:

    Cant wait to see how it plays out! 
     

    Y’all definitely have the #1 WR/TE rooms. Here’s to hoping we find a WR that could be called a threat to your DBs

    lol here’s to hoping you don’t! Jk, my worst nightmare is Arch starting his Heisman campaign in Columbus, Ohio. Just like a Texas QB from 20 years ago that I forget the name of 😉

    Edited by LovingBuckeye
    12 minutes ago, LovingBuckeye said:

    I do just want to say that Carnell Tate was probably the 5th option in Ohio State’s offense and has nearly 2x the stats of Ryan Wingo in nearly every category. Catches, yards, and touchdowns.

    I’m aware.  Maybe he’s #2 this year.  Maybe #3.  But he is the most veteran of your experienced skill players returning in this offense.

    53 minutes ago, LovingBuckeye said:

    Hey Here for the Wins, thank you for you comment and I’ll give my opinions on each one of your comments

    1. I believe Ohio State will have one of the best offensive lines in the country because they return all 3 of their IOL starters from last season as well as their top two backups. Aside from that, the tackles have reportedly played very well in fall camp. Also, Ohio State has invested heavily in the OL coaching staff this off season, which I believe is the largest OL staff in CFB.

    2. Ohio State’s CB’s and safeties go up against Ohio State’s wide receivers every day in practice. They won’t face better receivers than what they see on the daily. Carnell Tate was highly sought after by Brian Hartline, so that tells me all I need to know about Tate.

    3. As for the TE room, it’s not just Max Klare. That room goes 4 deep with legitimate P4 starters, but I have seen Max Klare on several first round mock drafts, I haven’t seen Endries on any mock drafts.

    4. I could be undervaluing the wide receivers but how would I know when they’ve never done it before?

    5. I’m very confident in Ohio State’s OL against Texas’ DL. Especially because I’m not expecting UT’s DT’s to be dominant and the IOL is Ohio State’s strength.

    I think OSU has a slight advantage of the IOL versus our IDL but not much. I do believe our edge room is much better than  your OTs.

    i think you have the advantage in the CBs but it’s probably a push on the safeties. 
     

    Your WR/TE room is ahead of us. 
    Our defense has always been bend don’t break, don’t give up anything over the top.  
    It will be interesting to see if our OL/RBs can be better than last year. Our run defense will be good. 
     

    how’s your kicker? It may come down to a field goal

    5 minutes ago, HookemChappy said:

    I think OSU has a slight advantage of the IOL versus our IDL but not much. I do believe our edge room is much better than  your OTs.

    i think you have the advantage in the CBs but it’s probably a push on the safeties. 
     

    Your WR/TE room is ahead of us. 
    Our defense has always been bend don’t break, don’t give up anything over the top.  
    It will be interesting to see if our OL/RBs can be better than last year. Our run defense will be good. 
     

    how’s your kicker? It may come down to a field goal

    Yeah, UT’s defense was frustrating. Styles make fights, and Texas’ D is the kryptonite for our WR’s. Ohio State wants to face man, like Tennessee, Oregon, and Notre Dame. Hopefully our IOL can winning the battles and allow James Peoples and CJ Donaldson Jr to control the game.

    As for Ohio State’s kicker, it’s Jayden Fielding. He’s a returning starter but inconsistent. Missed a couple easy FG’s against Michigan that cost Ohio State the game. Fielding was perfect in the playoffs though, so our hope is that he’ll bring that momentum into the season. If Fielding is lining up to kick a 45+ yard field goal, we have very little confidence it’s going through.

    12 minutes ago, Here for the Wins said:

    I’m aware.  Maybe he’s #2 this year.  Maybe #3.  But he is the most veteran of your experienced skill players returning in this offense.

    Ohio State isn’t concerned about their wide receivers. There shouldn’t be any drop off from last season, only difference is Brandon Innis is replacing Emeka Egbuka, but Innis should be every bit as good.

    Our concern is our OL and QB allowing the receivers to get the ball against Texas’ edge rushers and linebackers. 

    • Hook 'Em 1
    22 hours ago, Dread-headed Texan said:

    When watching the spring game or his time in against Michigan State I didn't see him powering the ball into tight windows. People confuse being able to throw far and a strong arm. Joe Milton has a strong arm, Will Howard had a strong arm, that's not what you get from Sayin. 

    Will Howard’s arm is very average. If he had any juice he would have been taken higher than the 5th or 6th round with his size and mobility after the season he just put together. 

    I would bet that Sayin has a stronger arm overall. 

    25 minutes ago, LovingBuckeye said:

    Ohio State isn’t concerned about their wide receivers. There shouldn’t be any drop off from last season, only difference is Brandon Innis is replacing Emeka Egbuka, but Innis should be every bit as good.

    Our concern is our OL and QB allowing the receivers to get the ball against Texas’ edge rushers and linebackers. 

    I understand.  You just churn WRs.  We’re kinda getting there across the board.  One guy moves on the next one steps up.

    It starts and mostly ends up front.  For both sides.

    If your QB has all day, then your pass catchers have a day.  If we harass him all day, that lowers your chances.

    4 minutes ago, Here for the Wins said:

    I understand.  You just churn WRs.  We’re kinda getting there across the board.  One guy moves on the next one steps up.

    It starts and mostly ends up front.  For both sides.

    If your QB has all day, then your pass catchers have a day.  If we harass him all day, that lowers your chances.

    100%




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.