Jump to content
  • Men's Hoops: Texas might be back on the bubble after an 88-85 overtime loss to Oklahoma


    AUSTIN, Texas — Jordan Pope's game-high 30 points and Dailyn Swain knocking on the door of a triple-double (18 points, eight assists, seven rebounds and three steals) weren't enough to help Texas avoid a gut-wrenching 88-85 overtime loss to Oklahoma on Saturday.

    Pope and Tramon Mark went a combined 8-for-8 at the foul line over the last 27.9 seconds of regulation to send the game to overtime. Unfortunately, Texas (18-13, 9-9 SEC) shot 3-for-8 from the field in overtime, and the Sooners hit enough big shots down the stretch to get a win inside Moody Center on senior night.

    The Longhorns won nine of the 10 previous meetings against Oklahoma (17-14, 7-11). Aside from dropping a game to the Sooners that could've been its 10th SEC win, Texas heads into the conference tournament likely back on the NCAA Tournament bubble.

    Here's how the Longhorns ended the regular season with a disappointing loss:

     

    FIRST HALF

     

    Oklahoma 8, Texas 5 (15:55)

    — A 1-for-4 start to the game by the Longhorns and the Sooners, knocking down three of their first six shots, had the visitors on top at the under-16 media timeout.

    Oklahoma doubled Matas Vokietaitis every time he touched the ball, except for the last time, when Kirill Elatontsev fouled Vokietaitis hard from behind. On one of those double teams, Vokietaitis kicked the ball to Jordan Pope for a 3-pointer in front of the Sooner bench.

    Sean Miller put Chendall Weaver in the starting lineup on senior night. When play resumed coming out of the timeout, however, Cam Heide entered the game, putting the usual starting five on the floor for the Longhorns.

     

    Oklahoma 17, Texas 11 (11:40)

    — By the 15:06 mark of the half, the Longhorns had almost as many turnovers (three) as attempted field goals (five). The Sooners enjoyed a 6-0 run until Vokietaitis snapped it with a trip to the foul line, knocking down two free throws with 13:57 to go in the half to make it a three-point game, 10-7.

    Amid a 2-for-8 start from the field, Texas went 5:18 between field goals, when Vokietaitis spun toward the baseline for a dunk to end the drought.

    Both clubs headed to the bench for the under-12 media timeout with six team fouls. Free-throw shooting played a big role in the game early on, with Oklahoma (7-for-9) and the Longhorns (6-for-6) converting at the foul line at a high clip.

     

    Oklahoma 24, Texas 20 (7:51)

    — Pope and Vokietaitis combined for the Longhorns’ four field goals entering the under-8 media timeout. It wasn’t until coming out of the stoppage that a steal and layup by Swain, when a Texas player other than Pope or Voketaitis made a bucket.

    There were 15 combined fouls between the two teams by the 10:05 mark, putting Texas and the Sooners in the bonus. A tightly officiated, physical game made it hard for either team to get into a flow offensively, with high-percentage shots few and far between.

     

    Texas 30, Oklahoma 30 (4:19)

    — A 10-0 highlighted by two Vokietaitis three-point plays was the offensive surge the Longhorns needed to get back into the game.

    Porter Moser called a timeout to talk things over with his club after a 3-pointer by Swain tied the game. By that point, Texas had recovered from a horrific start to the game offensively, making four of eight shots entering the stoppage.

    Swain’s 3-pointer ignited a 7-0 run by the Longhorns, highlighted by Swain’s alley-oop to Weaver, who threw down a thunderous one-handed jam, which sent the home crowd into a frenzy. Pope’s fourth 3-pointer of the half at the 2:33 mark put Texas up by six, the largest lead of the half for the Longhorns.

    The Sooners ended the half in a 2-for-10 shooting slump, going the last 5:27 of the half without a field goal en route to a 34.6-percent performance from the field (9-for-26, including 1-for-6 from beyond the arc). After a 3-for-12 start to the game, the Longhorns hit seven of their last 15 shots and headed into halftime after a 37-percent (10-for-27, including 5-for-14 on 3-pointers) effort from the floor.

    With 25 combined fouls, Texas (15-for-16 from the foul line) and Oklahoma (17-for-20 on free throws) did enough damage at the charity stripe to salvage an otherwise clunky first half offensively for both sides.

     

    HALFTIME: Texas 40, Oklahoma 36

    — Pope (16 points on 4-for-13 shooting, including 4-for-9 from 3-point range) led three Longhorns in double figures at the half. Swain (10 points, three rebounds, three assists and two steals) and Vokietaitis (10 points) also reached double figures in the first half.

     

    SECOND HALF

     

    Oklahoma 45, Texas 43 (17:35)

    — A 6-0 run by the Sooners forced Miller to use a timeout less than three minutes into the second half. Oklahoma’s 4-for-4 start from the field erased its four-point halftime deficit, accounting for yet another forgettable first four minutes of the second half for the Longhorns.

    More often than not, Miller has been critical of what his club has done coming out of the locker room.

    With that said, Texas executed a well-designed play coming out of the timeout, with Pope finding Swain cutting to the basket for a bucket, giving the Longhorns 12 points in the paint. Swain’s third field goal of the game tied the game at 45.

     

    Oklahoma 47, Texas 45 (15:49)

    — A turnover by Pope led to a bucket by Tae Davis, putting the Sooners back on top entering the under-16 media timeout. Davis’ basket accounted for two of Oklahoma’s nine points off seven turnovers by the Longhorns.

    The Sooners owned a 22-20 edge on the glass, including five offensive rebounds that led to six second-chance points.

    Just like the previous second-half stoppage, however, a drive to the hoop by Swain for two tied the game. Swain’s 14 points came on a 4-for-5 effort from the field (1-for-2 on 3-pointers and 5-for-6 on free throws).

     

    Oklahoma 48, Texas 47 (14:52)

    — Vokietaitis checked out of the game after picking up his third foul. He and Heide were on the bench with three fouls.

     

    Texas 51, Oklahoma 51 (11:39)

    — Heide redeemed himself for a missed 3-pointer, taking a pass from Swain on the left side of the floor and driving in for a scoop shot to tie the game at 51. Elatontsev’s fourth foul (this one for grabbing Vokietaitis to try and deny him an entry pass) triggered the under-12 media timeout, which the Sooners entered while in the midst of a 2:15 scoring drought.

     

    Oklahoma 63, Texas 57 (7:53)

    — The Sooners outscored the Longhorns 9-2 after Swain converted two free throws to tie the game at 55, taking a six-point lead into the under-8 media timeout. Oklahoma made its last three shots and four of its last five attempts ahead of the stoppage.

    A 3-pointer by Nijel Pack at the 8:26 mark gave the veteran guard 11 points in the second half.

     

    Oklahoma 69, Texas 57 (6:50)

    — Three turnovers in a span of 1:58 by the Longhorns aided a 14-2 run by the Sooners. Two Texas turnovers led directly to Oklahoma 3-pointers, one by Pack and one by Xzayvier Brown in front his bench, to give the Sooners a 12-point lead, their largest of the game.

     

    Oklahoma 69, Texas 62 (4:59)

    — A bucket by Vokietaitis ended a 9-0 run by the Sooners and Mark’s first 3-pointer of the game cut the Longhorns’ deficit to five. After Dayton Forsythe missed a jumper, Swain’s lob to Codie for an alley-oop at the other end of the floor made it a 7-0 run by Texas.

    The run ended with Brown’s drive to the bucket for two, but Pope’s 3-pointer with the shot clock winding down when play resumed made it a four-point game with 3:23 remaining in regulation.

     

    Oklahoma 71, Texas 69 (1:56)

    — After Pack missed the front end of a one-and-one trip to the foul line, Mark’s pull-up jumper from the foul line cut the Sooners’ lead to two. Moser called a timeout to set something up for a critical possession with the Longhorns threatening to take the lead.

     

    Oklahoma 75, Texas 69 (27.9 seconds)

    — A baseline drive by Davis coming out of the timeout made it a four-point game. After Pope missed a desperation 3-pointer from the corner, Mohamed Wague’s two-handed finish on an alley-oop extended the Sooners’ lead to six points with 38.3 seconds left in regulation.

    Mark headed to the foul line to try and give the Longhorns a chance in the closing seconds.

     

    Oklahoma 75, Texas 74 (15.6 seconds)

    — Five free throws by Mark and a turnover by the Sooners helped get the Longhorns within a point of tying the game.

     

    Oklahoma 77, Texas 74 (3.6 seconds)

    — Davis made two foul shots with 14.3 seconds to go, but Pope was fouled on a 3-point attempt at the other end. A video review upheld the 3-point attempt, sending Pope to the line for three shots to try and tie the game.

     

    END OF REGULATION: Texas 77, Oklahoma 77

    — Even with Moser calling a timeout between Pope’s second and third attempts, the senior guard made his foul shots to tie the game. Brown’s heave from just beyond the half-court stripe missed everything, which sent the game to overtime.

    The Longhorns headed to overtime with Mark, Vokietaitis and Heide in foul trouble with four each.

     

    OVERTIME

     

    Texas 82, Oklahoma 81 (1:16)

    — Mark missed two free throws that would’ve tied the game at 81. Thankfully, Davis threw the ball out of bounds trying to kick it out to Pack at the other end, giving the Longhorns a chance to tie or take the lead.

    Swain rebounded a missed 3-pointer and found Pope open on the wing for the go-ahead triple.

     

    Oklahoma 86, Texas 82 (1:04)

    — Wague’s tip-in of a missed 3-pointer by Pack gave the Sooners a lead they didn’t relinquish.

    Derrion Reid’s 3-pointer in the last 12 seconds of overtime was the dagger. Two free throws by Pack made it a 7-0 run by Oklahoma after Pope’s 3-pointer, handing the Longhorns a gut-wrenching loss heading into the SEC Tournament.

     

    FINAL (OT): Oklahoma 88, Texas 85

    • Sad 3

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Coach Miller said defensive limitations last night. He’s right they have been limited all year. You can’t fix their limitations. The team was better defensively last year. However, given their numbers defensively this year, most top 100 teams would have looked better last year. Looked at some games previous games again. They are slow getting around screens. Most of the switches defensively are very slow. So some of it is laziness and some of it is they just don’t want to do it. Heide can’t guard a chair. If you watch whoever he is guarding, they either score or get fouled by him. Codie doesn’t use his peripheral vision at all. Matas struggles passing out of the post. Swain has a lot of issues defensively as well. Pope shot so much because nobody else would. Mark missed so many opportunities to score early in overtime. They just didn’t look right from the start of the game. How do you get blown out one night and do this the next game? They just have too many positions where they are limited. The players that do most of the scoring often struggle defensively which would explain being 9-9. 

    • Hook 'Em 2
    9 hours ago, Jeff Howe said:

    Miller: "I thought Oklahoma defended us well. I don't think we defended in the first, maybe, 12 minutes of the second half."

    This is what pisses me off. How do you just decide to not play defense? Let me know so I won’t watch. Cultural has to change and guys need to go, including some that Miller brought to the team. 

    I think 6-12 in conference last season and still selected for a NCAA tournament appearance. The conference tournament performance last season helped before the committee made final decisions. The team played well. I think Mark was the spark then and will have to play all out in the conference tournament this year too to make it happen.

    • Moderators
    9 hours ago, Hexter said:

    @Jeff Howe how much improvement can we expect next season? I know we have recruited young talent but how many portal additions do you see as necessary? I know we have the coach now!

    All depends on Swain's decision - portal numbers (that goes into need, and NIL available). Matas won't be cheap - tier 1/blue bloods are reaching out to his agent (he's considered very elite at center by college coaches). Two players, if they both ended up coming back, would take up around 45-50% of possible/expected NIL. Goosby wasn't cheap. So what Texas can do with 3-4 needs will tell the story IMO. If Swain goes pro, more NIL money to build out the 2026-27 roster, but that's a tough player to replace for a tier 2/tier 3 NIL program. 

    Miller will build the program (which is what he should do). But a lot ultimately will come down to where NIL goes in the top tier of CBK, and how far off from the top the 2nd/3rd tiers sit in the NIL world. 

    Texas has the coach. If Texas can't compete in the correct sandbox, then the build is on a different timeline, and they will have to catch lightening in a bottle on 2-3 guys to ultimately maximize. 

    Miller was brought to Texas to legitimately build a sustainable program. He's really good, so it will happen. But seriously unrealistic fan base expectations in the college sports world rarely support that anymore.

     

    Something else that is of note: NIL wise I've talked to two college coaching buddies, and the demands of NIL levels required in major conferences are going to push for more 8 guys using up 75-80% of NIL in a lot of cases. Have a couple of minor role players at 15'ish %, and couple of developmental players. That means team health is going to take on more importance, and can crush some seasons. Roster depth not expected to be as prevalent with rev share affording every school the ability to compete/win out for really good role players. 

    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Moderators
    1 hour ago, Fan of the Game said:

    I think 6-12 in conference last season and still selected for a NCAA tournament appearance. The conference tournament performance last season helped before the committee made final decisions. The team played well. I think Mark was the spark then and will have to play all out in the conference tournament this year too to make it happen.

    Texas doesn't need to go on a run to make the NCAA Tournament like last year.

    It's pretty much this...

    Beat Ole Miss ... 10/11 seed line. Nothing will really change seeding wise.

    Lose to Ole Miss ... drop to play in game (which gets into jeopardy if there are 3-4 conference tournaments that have upset winners and forces multi-bid leagues, or extra power conference selection). 

     

    • Thanks 2

    If CDC cant give miller money to build a program hell be leavinf texas within the next few years for a school that gives him the money. He has the history to go to a school that actually values him this off-season will be the test if we are really considering taking basketball serious. You cant just have enough to keep two of your best players thats just pathetic and wouldn't blame any player for leaving if you dont have enough to build around them 😂 

    • Thanks 1
    11 minutes ago, Bevohorns said:

    If CDC cant give miller money to build a program hell be leavinf texas within the next few years for a school that gives him the money. He has the history to go to a school that actually values him this off-season will be the test if we are really considering taking basketball serious. You cant just have enough to keep two of your best players thats just pathetic and wouldn't blame any player for leaving if you dont have enough to build around them 😂 

    Will you relax for one day?

    You keep trying to act like we are the Oakland A’s and are making Sean Miller to mop the floor to save money on the budget. We have money and will spend money. Swain wasn’t free this year. Matas wasn’t free this year. Pope and Mark weren’t free this year. Goosby and Ogden aren’t coming for free.

    If your expectations is we will be Duke or Kentucky or Texas Tech with a sugar daddy, you aren’t being realistic. That isn’t a requirement to be good at college basketball. We are going to be competitive in our sandbox which is in a good tier of college basketball.

    Edited by Assistant Regional Manager
    • Hook 'Em 1
    • Haha 1
    22 minutes ago, Assistant Regional Manager said:

    Will you relax for one day?

    You keep trying to act like we are the Oakland A’s and are making Sean Miller to mop the floor to save money on the budget. We have money and will spend money. Swain wasn’t free this year. Matas wasn’t free this year. Pope and Mark weren’t free this year. Goosby and Ogden aren’t coming for free.

    If your expectations is we will be Duke or Kentucky or Texas Tech with a sugar daddy, you aren’t being realistic. That isn’t a requirement to be good at college basketball. We are going to be competitive in our sandbox which is in a good tier of college basketball.

    Dude I am expecting to have a more complete team in year 2 and if we dont have the funds for that then thats not building a program because not winning wont give the program more money. Have to invest year two and have a better team than what we have. My expectations for year two arent final 4 either but at minimum being ranked at some point with less Ls against teams that we shouldn't lose to. Swain and matas are good but they are not enough for a better record next year need a few players that contribute more than guys on the team this year. 

    • Thanks 1
    3 minutes ago, Bevohorns said:

    Dude I am expecting to have a more complete team in year 2 and if we dont have the funds for that then thats not building a program because not winning wont give the program more money. Have to invest year two and have a better team than what we have. My expectations for year two arent final 4 either but at minimum being ranked at some point with less Ls against teams that we shouldn't lose to. Swain and matas are good but they are not enough for a better record next year need a few players that contribute more than guys on the team this year. 

    You are talking about Sean Miller leaving for another school, which is putting about 10 carts before the horse.

    • Hook 'Em 1
    4 hours ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

    All depends on Swain's decision - portal numbers (that goes into need, and NIL available). Matas won't be cheap - tier 1/blue bloods are reaching out to his agent (he's considered very elite at center by college coaches). Two players, if they both ended up coming back, would take up around 45-50% of possible/expected NIL. Goosby wasn't cheap. So what Texas can do with 3-4 needs will tell the story IMO. If Swain goes pro, more NIL money to build out the 2026-27 roster, but that's a tough player to replace for a tier 2/tier 3 NIL program. 

    Miller will build the program (which is what he should do). But a lot ultimately will come down to where NIL goes in the top tier of CBK, and how far off from the top the 2nd/3rd tiers sit in the NIL world. 

    Texas has the coach. If Texas can't compete in the correct sandbox, then the build is on a different timeline, and they will have to catch lightening in a bottle on 2-3 guys to ultimately maximize. 

    Miller was brought to Texas to legitimately build a sustainable program. He's really good, so it will happen. But seriously unrealistic fan base expectations in the college sports world rarely support that anymore.

     

    Something else that is of note: NIL wise I've talked to two college coaching buddies, and the demands of NIL levels required in major conferences are going to push for more 8 guys using up 75-80% of NIL in a lot of cases. Have a couple of minor role players at 15'ish %, and couple of developmental players. That means team health is going to take on more importance, and can crush some seasons. Roster depth not expected to be as prevalent with rev share affording every school the ability to compete/win out for really good role players. 

    You would know better, but I don’t see him coming back. He certainly has things he needs to work on. He is young for his class but if he is a first round pick then you have to either get a discount or come close to the money. What good is developing players like Matas only to watch them leave? Hopefully player coach relationships will matter. It’s not like football where they essentially lowered the players on the team to raise money. The guys at the end of this bench are not making money. Texas needs a combo guard that can shoot the ball, likely a small forward, without question a power forward that can face the basket and then a bench. Don’t understand why they bring in a coach to build a program but not give him the money to do that. Catching lightning in a bottle is not something program builders say. To me that’s asking him to do something without the tools to do it. Coach Miller wants to get that elite eight monkey off his back and that doesn’t fit with lightning in a bottle. What Miller needs and what CDC thinks he needs are not in line with each other. When does Miller say enough? We can’t just watch them lose every year to Kentucky, Arkansas and say well what do you expect? Texas doesn’t have that kind of money. Coach Miller makes fans actually want to watch his teams play. Maybe the underestimated just how good he is. Just my opinion. Somebody else will have to chop something off this time. I need my one hand.

    4 hours ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

    Texas doesn't need to go on a run to make the NCAA Tournament like last year.

    It's pretty much this...

    Beat Ole Miss ... 10/11 seed line. Nothing will really change seeding wise.

    Lose to Ole Miss ... drop to play in game (which gets into jeopardy if there are 3-4 conference tournaments that have upset winners and forces multi-bid leagues, or extra power conference selection). 

     

    The tournament was always the expectation for me. What they do is irrelevant for me. 
     

    3 hours ago, Assistant Regional Manager said:

    Will you relax for one day?

    You keep trying to act like we are the Oakland A’s and are making Sean Miller to mop the floor to save money on the budget. We have money and will spend money. Swain wasn’t free this year. Matas wasn’t free this year. Pope and Mark weren’t free this year. Goosby and Ogden aren’t coming for free.

    If your expectations is we will be Duke or Kentucky or Texas Tech with a sugar daddy, you aren’t being realistic. That isn’t a requirement to be good at college basketball. We are going to be competitive in our sandbox which is in a good tier of college basketball.

    You lost me on Pope and Mark not being free. If they somehow got more NIL based on last year then we are worse off financially than I thought. 




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.