Oldest Horn

This “value” is about as real as a new crypto currency.

Bengals are notorious for this crap. Can’t blame Stewart here.

Leaks was a game changer on so many levels.

Baab started at guard as a true freshman and soph, then moved to center. Tremendous player who went on to a great pro career.

Do you recall a kid picking Texas who greatly disrespected another school in the process? Or could have done it “better”? Didn’t think so.

Hubert was a 3year starter and captain.

Did Ewers wear 58?

Not much. Both teams put their own spin on the offense, and plenty of others ran it effectively without spending a couple of days with our staff.

Title IX guarantees access not comp. Revenue sharing will rule the day.

One, Stanford, if they chose to.

It’s a projection based on gate receipts, staff costs, travel costs, etc. And now that revenue sharing is in the mix it will even be tougher for even the marginal revenue sports to be profitable. Nothing sexist about it.

Nobis

“NCAA not making available the schools where softball programs are profitable” What does this even mean? My point remains you seem to know enough to play the sexism card while not knowing the economics of the sport you’re criticizing. That seems rather incongruent to me.

You need the NCAA to get ticket prices? Yet you know enough to claim sexism. Gotcha

I will agree that our softball team is a unicorn in college softball. But UT sports are that way in general. Austin is the largest market without a pro sports team. If we chose to add men’s and women’s lacrosse they’d have the best gates in collegiate lacrosse. How many D1 softball programs are there? How many would you consider profitable? How many have a similar gate yield as baseball?