drag worm

Lotta revisionist history in this thread. Arch was either woefully unprepared to take over the starting spot at QB after two seasons on campus or he had a serious mental block going on when attempting to complete straight forward passes to wide open receivers during the first half of the season. Yes, the OL was awful and the running game was non existent but Arch’s inability to confidently quarterback the offense was apparent to anyone watching those games. We know because of the second half of the season that it wasn’t just an inability to play the position. He grew into the role mentally and physically. It was basically like watching a true freshman QB evolving as a season goes on instead of a third year sophomore. To the point of the OPs question, if history is any indication go back to the 2010 offseason where Mack attempted to model his spread offense into more of the power running ball control offense that Muschamp wanted to complement his D with. We all know how that went, by halftime of the Rice opener. (A fascinating game to rewatch btw.) Sark seems perfectly capable of building via the portal and running an offense that will provide complimentary football to Muschamps side of the ball so I’d imagine things go better this time around.

Lost to Texas. Didn’t play for a conference championship. No CFP wins. Bahahahahahahaah.

It’ll be interesting to see how game 2 goes. PK held OSU to 21 and 14 in our two matchups with them. That will be the standard on Defense going into that game.

3rd in scoring is flirting with elite? Offense hasn’t sniffed that kind of ranking.

Thanks for letting us know!

No they have buyouts

Transferring without penalty seems to be the biggest issue. If all players had to sit out a year like they did in conference back in the day it would slow down this ridiculous re-shifting of rosters every off season. I saw one kid was heading to his seventh school this offseason. I get NIL, I get fair market value, but transferring without penalty does not seem like a universal right.

It’s a gamble to considering him doing something he hasn’t shown yet. Go rewatch the Georgia game from this year and tell me why 10 months later he’s going to be the difference maker that Texas is missing at WR. He played way too timid and went down way too easy in that game. I love Wingo but think he’d play a much better role as more of a second option outlet in the passing game. Less pressure on him and he wouldn’t get everyone’s top DB matchups.

This reminds me of the time Baylor melted down and we ended up snagging Duvernay and Patrick Hudson after signing day.

What are the actual chances of a Juluke / Baugh kind of deal. That’s the kind of power move I anticipated Texas making in the NIL era.

Raid them for 2-3 OL at minimum.