TexasLonghorns

Right, because every coach and their agents openly announce their next job search midseason. Come on.

Thrives on anonymous sources every day… national reporter does it, suddenly it’s ‘garbage’? Are you discrediting Bobby and Gerry now?

Someone’s gotta follow the facts while others follow grudges. You keep swinging, but the scoreboard tells the story, you’re playing in the wrong league, son.

Agents saying “there’s no truth to the story” is standard practice. What did people expect? Doesn’t mean it’s not true, they just want you to believe it isn’t. The cat is out of the bag now.

Haha, SUREEEE! Is he supposed to admit to it?

Sark’s not building a dynasty, he’s building an exit plan. Turns out he’s not as loyal to Texas as some of the fans are to him. Mid season and already eyeing the first NFL off ramp. Loyalty fades fast when the league calls.

Letting that kind of info leak mid season feels like a dangerous game. Easy way to burn bridges with Texas leadership if they think his eyes are already on the NFL.

You have zero clue how this works. She’s a senior nfl insider who has deep ties to agents and nfl circles.

Kinda wild to have your reps floating NFL interest mid season. That’s how you burn a lot of trust with Texas leadership and fans.

Yeah, Dianna Russini’s not just tweeting that for fun, she’s plugged in. If she’s saying it, it’s coming from somewhere real.

There may be a lack of talent in certain areas, but that’s a direct result of staff decisions. When you’ve signed four straight top 5 classes and had full access to the transfer portal, any roster holes reflect evaluation and development issues, not roster limitations.

Just to be clear, I’m not arguing Herman was better than Sark. My point is about context: Herman never had NIL, the transfer portal, or the ability to cherry pick experienced elite players to fill gaps in the roster. Those tools drastically change roster construction and depth, which makes comparing “never sniffed the playoffs” without acknowledging them misleading. Sark has had all those advantages for five years, yet many issues on offense and lack of QB development remain Adding context to a discussion board isn’t flawed logic, even if it’s not popular. I’ll leave it here. My points are fact based, focused on observable results, and stand regardless of personal opinions or attacks. For anyone genuinely interested in a data driven discussion, the evidence is clear.

This conversation started with comparing Herman never sniffing the playoffs to Sark in terms of results and context. I’m here to discuss observable outcomes, not to pull anyone’s chain. NIL, the transfer portal, and top tier recruiting have changed what’s expected from Texas coaches. I appreciate everyone keeping the discussion respectful and focused on the facts, with the exception of those who resort to personal jabs.

When someone starts making it personal, it usually means they’ve run out of real arguments. I’m not “negative,” I’m focused on results and those results still don’t match the resources Sark’s had. Going from 5–7 to the playoff with NIL, the portal, and a top 5 roster every year isn’t the same as building from scratch without those tools. The same issues stagnant offense, QB regression, and no clear identity are still there. And to be clear, the claim about multiple conference “titles” is misleading. Sark won the Big 12 once and made the SEC Championship game once. Claiming “titles” implies dominance that hasn’t actually happened. That’s reality, and it stands regardless of the personal insults you throw. Unless I’m misremembering, weren’t conference titles and semi final playoff appearances only supposed to “count” if you actually won them? That’s the line we used to tell OU fans back in the Herman days. Seems like the standards have conveniently changed.