Jump to content

Battrayal

Supporters
  • Posts

    223
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Battrayal

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Battrayal's Achievements

Sophomore

Sophomore (3/9)

  • Very Popular
  • Collaborator
  • Reacting Well
  • First Post
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

326

Reputation

  1. The pk thing is because he had a better one lined up. Just like we let Parker go to get cam. Who do you suggest we replace flood with? I’m pretty indifferent on him but that’s because I don’t see this IOL portal class as anything worth getting mad over. The ones worth it, imo, we went after (brunner/Michigan guys/siani) but other than that it’s a bunch of meh. Which i think isn’t a sure fire better option than guys like Cojoe or Chatman in the program for a few years. the thing about the portal class for me is depth, which there is still time for. I don’t pretend to know some of these guys asks for PT or $$ so hard to say who they should get, but the rest of the class has earned trust with me. If we get to 2026 with another poor oline then it’ll be time to ask the hard questions. Just too early for me personally
  2. He would be an awesome Clark replacement. Wouldn’t be surprised if he wanted a bigger role with fletcher back another year
  3. Whatever happened to Antonio Tripp? He was a Miami guy before spending a year at FIU. Could be another Sikorsky guy to compete
  4. Lol I said "this is where Carson beck throws a pick" right before that snap.. so predictable
  5. what guaranteed starting left guards were available in the portal besides Brunner (who we went after hard)?
  6. are any of those 1000+ snap guys any good? which ones would you have wanted us to sign (actual question since I dont know about all the players) the ones ive looked at weren't all that impressive (though hasnt been all of them so would love your thoughts). The couple of plug and play starters we went after hard (brunner/guaranara) but couldnt land. idk what their plan is, but my plan would be to then sign one or more of those guys still left and let em battle it out. I feel just as comfortable with that as I do with them signing someone super meh like Tshabola (who may have wanted a starter guarantee) and paying his price tag, since I know a couple of OSU fans who were so happy he left. Though with our awful guard play at the beginning of last year, that may be an upgrade but I'd rather have waited it out at the time he made his decision. I think talking about options and line play is way more productive than just saying we dont have a guard
  7. who are the multiple quality guards we passed on? Serious question. Looking at the list of all the guys who have signed already, its a bunch of question marks and meh. I get that our OG play was so bad last year that meh is attractive, but thats what id qualify sikorsky as (meh, with upside). I may be missing them or not know about everyone, but doesnt seem like there are "multiple quality guards" we passed on that would be surefire starters, though I am totally open to those names and will join you if thats the case. I honestly like the approach of filling with one meh (with upside) and seeing if theres a chance to get a true difference maker. If we filled it with like Tshabola (who was bad last year for OSU) early then we might put ourselves out of the running for a better player. Especially since those guys probably were asking for wayy more money than their play dictates, which obviously us as fans dont see, but the staff does. IDK i just see the level of investment the coaches have for this year (Cam/RB tandem/Siani are NOT cheap) and have to trust that they wouldnt trot out such a big hole as last year. All indications are that they recognize the issue from last year and need to correct it. But im with you that it sucks that its not fixed right now!
  8. it usually has a buyout associated with it. but we will see if those are enforceable. thats what the lawsuit with Damon Wilson is about
  9. why not add more talent then
  10. Womack also out there too... Ole Miss losing all of their edge
  11. Yeah and that he signed a $2.6MM deal.. has to be for two years right? No way he got Seaton money
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.