harveycmd

Much more likely to be successful in federal court.

Get back with me when Brunson has a couple more titles, is first team all-NBA a few times, and maybe makes an all defensive team a time or two.

I asked you cite the state constitutional basis for your claim that it's the job of the Texas AG to defend every state entity in every possible interstate legal situation. Given that I know there is no basis for the claim, I correlated it with Cliff Clavin claims.

Not saying the Knicks didn't deserve to win. Saying Brunson isn't great and certainly not "generational." If you look at it objectively, there's no question that all the match-ups broke in the Knicks' favor. They missed Boston. They got Cleveland. Then they missed OKC and got the more favorable match-up with SA. Even then, the Spurs had to choke worse than any team in NBA Finals history for the Knicks to win. The chances of that happening again are slim to none. In five years, Brunson will be viewed as a fortunate one hit wonder.

See what you did to the basketball world Spurs? Biggest chokers in the history of professional sports and now the rest of us have to listen to Knicks fans spew nonsense for a couple years.

Wemby's not mentally tough enough to become an all time great. You don't cheap shot guys and then leave the floor without shaking hands with the team that just beat you for the title if there's not something missing.

I've never seen a team literally melt away in every game in the NBA Finals like the Spurs. Many teams have been overmatched and swept, but there's never been a team that was clearly superior, held a double digit lead in every game, yet choked every time. Spurs couldn't man up at all. They couldn't compete under pressure. Mitch Johnson coached the worst Finals series ever seen. I'm glad I'm not a Spurs fan. They're not recovering from this.

I think Bobbers is giving us the Cliff Clavin analysis of Texas AG duties.

It's not a ruling but rather an injunction granted pending litigation that results in a ruling. Try citing the description in the Texas Constitution that verifies your contention that the Attorney General is required in all circumstances to defend state entities regardless of context and other state court activities, which may include other state injunctions. It seems to me you might well be an unwitting legal positivist in the tradition of Hans Kelsen.

Seeing the criminal sooners dominate Bama is no bueno. Need to pull that rabbit's foot out.

No it isn't. The job description is to uphold the law. There's no law in the state of Texas that says college athletes can gamble on their own team. You're very confused.

The Spurrier Gators remind me of the Dirk Mavs: softer than Charmin all but once.

Paxton has no legal ground to stand on. It's not the job of an AG to blindly support a state entity. This is a Campbell money thing.

To add on to this, without the 2001 rules changes made to stop Kobe and Shaq from winning ten titles, guys like Curry and Jokic would have been career NBA bench warmers, but many analytical goobers think they're great.

I've been wanting to post something about this, but thought it would be overkill given my previous criticism of talk about Wemby being the best 22 year old player in history. To throw him a bone, he can be the best player now and simply not be clutch. It's not his fault that being the best now doesn't really mean much.