All Activity

Don't get me wrong. Border Collie Gael is probably the best dog I've ever had. Smarter than a whip. Responds instantly to everything I command. Thinks on her own. Gathers stock from a mile. She doesn't track.

It’s the same in baseball. If you see a pitcher a couple times through the line up then you can dial in.

Went again this morning before dawn. Saw nothing but does and fawns. Gonna get me some curs and train em up.

Ok Herry where is a HI

84 days 🤘 Marquise Goodwin (2009-12)

I bet the atmosphere on campus will be pretty electric all weekend with the ladies winning the national title… should make for an excellent recruiting weekend

Doug Cousbie.

Needs more pieces around her. Just getting that team to one win away from winning it all is an accomplishment. Need better bats to go the distance.

Man, we wasted Goodwin. I would love to see what his Texas career would have been under Sark.

Canady gave up 8 runs in her last two innings pitched. The pressure we put on her just broke her in the end. It will be interesting to see how she performs next year. Can she build on it or is it in her head now.

Gotta be Lil Jordan. That effort play against OU was epic

I thought the same when TK didn't start game 2. I was really stoked when I saw us getting to Canady late in game 2. It's hard to throw 3 days in a row.

Texas Tech didn’t pay a dime for Canady . It was donor money. Texas came out strong, so proud of the Longhorns. Can’t wait until next year.”HOOKEM “

I’d definitely say it worked for them, national exposure, made it to the championship and had a chance to win it all, love fest for the Cinderella story. Without Canady they don’t even make a regional.

We are down to 84 days before the Horns square off against Ohio State. Who is your favorite No. 84? Jordan Washington: Marquise Goodwin: Lil’Jordan Humphrey: Brock Edwards:

Most trial lawyers don't understand larger constitutional principles. They worry about juries and who feels what. There aren't juries at the federal appellant level. This decision doesn't mean anything other than past players get money. Apply common sense rules to your employment. Does anyone have the right to deny your ability to make money through marketing deals? No. There's not a limit on marketing deals for pro athletes. The fact that most of these "deals" are brokered by colleges doesn't change that they are legally third party deals. That can't be legally limited. Judge didn't say it could.

They’ll have a special night for them. I bet it is bathed in orange tonight!

We need a Labor and Employment lawyer familiar with this to come on the show and discuss the intricacies of this agreement as signed by the judge and to lay out the probabilities of what is kosher or not in the agreement relative to the Supreme Court ruling, labor and employment law, and their relationship with NCAA rules.

I’d say in this case it worked well. She was the featured player of this tournament.

It’s a beautiful sight.

Another way to describe the cap nonsense talk is that idiot reporters repeat what they're told by the NCAA and universities don't know what they're talking about. Professional sports can have a "cap" because they have employees who agree to conditions of employment. This hasn't happened in college sports. This "settlement" has nothing to do with that. The SEC making their member schools agree to refrain from legally challenging the "settlement" doesn't mean anything. The individual players will legally challenge the limit on compensation, not the schools. Being a college sport or school doesn't exempt you from constitutional law. That's what the 2021 Supreme Court decision that allowed NIL clearly stated. Before that, there wasn't a federal court case that addressed the billion make in college sports.

Video won't clear it up because the guys who make videos don't understand the foundational principles of free market capitalism or constitutional law. You need to study the Supreme Court decision that legalized NIL. That decision clearly stated that the NCAA and their member institutions can't prevent anyone from earning anything. The only way to establish a limit on compensation is through an employment agreement. For some reason these idiots won't acknowledge that people who generate revenue are employees. You can avoid that legally, but then you can't limit their monetary opportunities for the service they provide that generates the revenue. I don't understand the deal here. It's really pretty simple.

Still not understanding this at all, can we do a video on this

Most ball chasing fans are dumber than dirt. Media says cap. Goobers repeat it. There's no constitutional way to deny compensation without a contract between the payer and the payee. No current college player has signed such an agreement with the NCAA or the institution for which they play. They have marketing deals called NIL. You can't just assign a third party to limit that. There's nothing in this court decision that mentions that. Judge doesn't care about that. Not her business.