All Activity
- Past hour
-
Hope CDC returns the favor to the Bucknuts
MasTecate replied to MasTecate's topic in On Texas Football Forum
🙄 -
Sundancekid started following Interesting note on Anthony Hill and his future in the NFL...
-
Totally agree.
-
36 Days Away From Kickoff -- Who's Your Favorite No. 36?
cochamps replied to Blake Munroe's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Looked up Graham's wiki and 6 seems to be a big number for him. Six years in the league with the Lions, in which he had 6 picks and 6 fumble recoveries. Very good safety in the late 70's for the good guys. - Today
-
Why would anyone pay any attention to that complete idiot Mike
-
He was tired and grumpy. SEC media daze. Leave the old dog alone.
-
-
Join us for Coffee and Football beginning around 8:15 AM, as we take your questions and discuss the latest on the Longhorns.
-
- 3
-
-
We are now 36 days away from the Longhorns taking on the Buckeyes in Columbus for the season opener. Who is your favorite Texas player to wear No. 36? Some options today include... William Graham Unfortunately I can not find a picture of William Graham, William Graham played as a defensive back for the Texas Longhorns from 1979 to 1981. In 1980, he recorded four interceptions in 11 games. In 1981, he had seven interceptions in 11 games, tying the school record, leading the Southwest Conference, and ranking third nationally. His 11 career interceptions placed him fourth all-time at Texas. He was drafted by the Detroit Lions in the fifth round of the 1982 NFL Draft. Lamaar Houston We will cheat a little bit on this one, as he also wore 33, but so we can have a pic today...
-
Keep in mind this was on that Pansy Podcast with Commie Mike, who loves anti-Texas schtick, thinking it will help him in the aggregate market.
-
I agree. It's partially filling an obvious policy vacuum. A former USFL owner who can't resist. Thanks.
-
Constitutionally speaking, there's really no foundation for the validity of the order. If the order purports to provide guidance to the departments of the executive branch about how to execute the application of federal law, the immediate response is there is no law. Conversely, if the order intends to establish a "legal framework" for departments of the executive branch to enforce legal restrictions established by the order itself, then it clearly violates separation of powers and is simply unconstitutional. Either way it has no chance of affecting the actual outcome of this saga. It's pure theatre.
-
Barstool forgot the "A$M" after Texas. Wrong team, Barstool! Hook 'Em!