Sark said to CJ Vogel's question: "The question is vague."

[Levester White]

@CJ Vogel asked about the defensive pressures and adjustments, hot reads, and whether Sark is seeing enough quicks and hots and adjustments from Arch.  

He then gives a little word salad, then says he thinks he -(Arch) does what he's asked to do on particular plays, and that the question is vague. 

No, that was a weak answer to a great question. 

So now we know he's not seeing the field; neither is he able to audible. Even worse, Sark is NOT getting Arch and the offense out of bad looks.

Sark is saying it without saying it, and will die on this hill. 

I'm convinced that if we do not see changes on Saturday, we are cooked with Sark.

I want to see him do well, but he's doubling down and not seeing that we have a major issue here.  

 

[DanielOnorato]

I found sarks answer there disrespectful and condescending.

It's a question all of us want to know an answer to. Great job, CJ. Disappointed in Sarks response and attitude there. 

[HornsInAmarillo]

It's been very clear for several years that there is zero chance of winning a championship with sark. He is not that sharp, is arrogant, and refuses to change. The offense and it's players continue to regress. Way past time for him to go!!!

[Levester White]

11 minutes ago, DanielOnorato said:

I found sarks answer there disrespectful and condescending.

It's a question all of us want to know an answer to. Great job, CJ. Disappointed in Sarks response and attitude there. 

Same. I'm beginning to wonder, man. I don't feel good about this team with him leading the offense. 

[Levester White]

7 minutes ago, HornsInAmarillo said:

It's been very clear for several years that there is zero chance of winning a championship with sark. He is not that sharp, is arrogant, and refuses to change. The offense and it's players continue to regress. Way past time for him to go!!!

As a coordinator, it's time for him to take a hike. His pride and ego are taking this team down. I don't blame Eston Royal. I wouldn't come here either. Recruits see what's going on. 

[HookedOnTF]

The answer for better or worse takes the burden off of the QB, and puts it on the OC. 

Arch did what he was asked and it didnt work on 3 and outs so.....

But thats why I'd put some analytics data to him where we are, indisputably, statistically way below standards, and ask what can be done about it. Specific. And anticipating and ruling out the coachspeak, e.g. why do we suck on third down will just elicit got to be better running the ball on early downs.

[Levester White]

8 minutes ago, HookedOnTF said:

The answer for better or worse takes the burden off of the QB, and puts it on the OC. 

Arch did what he was asked and it didnt work on 3 and outs so.....

But thats why I'd put some analytics data to him where we are, indisputably, statistically way below standards, and ask what can be done about it. Specific. And anticipating and ruling out the coachspeak, e.g. why do we suck on third down will just elicit got to be better running the ball on early downs.

Yep! That part. 

[Guts]

Yea CJ asked him a direct question and Sark called it vague. Does he think we are stupid? I don’t get it. 

[Nate C]

Sark seemed pretty frustrated today. He’s not going to slam Arch publicly but I get the vibe he isn’t always happy with his QBs decision making.