Mack Brown.  53-16

Conference championships. 0

Sark.  52-21

Conference Championship 1

Many wanted to move on from Mack too. Not sure if Sark will win big bit I found this comparison interesting. 

6 hours ago, MBHORNSFAN said:

Mack Brown.  53-16

Conference championships. 0

Sark.  52-21

Conference Championship 1

Many wanted to move on from Mack too. Not sure if Sark will win big bit I found this comparison interesting. 

Now do OU record in first 5 years Mack 2-3 and 0-3 against stoops with 1 blowout loss, Sark 3-2 and 3-1 against Venables with 3 blowout wins and 2 others that should’ve been wins. 

Comparable, but you also have to factor in outside factors.  Mack didn't have to worry as much about roster turnover due to NIL, but he also couldn't just go out and buy (buy some accounts) the most expensive roster in college football this year.

Mack had VY. 

11 hours ago, MBHORNSFAN said:

Mack Brown.  53-16

Conference championships. 0

Sark.  52-21

Conference Championship 1

Many wanted to move on from Mack too. Not sure if Sark will win big bit I found this comparison interesting. 

I remember fans getting a bit irked by Mack’s inability to get over the hump. Then he listened to advice, realized his approach to the offense didn’t fit the players, and let Vince be Vince. Sark is at the same crossroads. The question is will he make changes as needed in order to win? TBD

12 hours ago, MBHORNSFAN said:

Mack Brown.  53-16

Conference championships. 0

Sark.  52-21

Conference Championship 1

Many wanted to move on from Mack too. Not sure if Sark will win big bit I found this comparison interesting. 

 

Careful, a little voice of reason does not usually appease the mob, whose thirst is only quenched by blood.

Even more frustrating hearing all the coaches and former players seeing what we all see and still the head coach refuses to change or adjust. 

Hearing Tony Hills gave me another headache. Maybe I can’t handle watching this Texas team.

Edited October 14Oct 14 by rgvhorn80