Poll: Is it Sark or Arch or something else

[westx]

This issue has been discussed, rinsed and repeated for two weeks now.  A lot of good well thought out theories I have heard on OTF Youtube videos.  The national media also following closely.  I am on Arch's side at this point and don't believe it is him.   The main points that I think are valid:

1: Arch has been in the system 3 1/2 years, what gives? How much time does somebody need.  He isn't making good reads and holding on to the ball too long

2: The OL cannot block worth a flip-how many years has this been an issue

3: No running game-how many years has this been an issue?

4: Sark/Flood don't know how to adjust to the constant blitzing.  Same crap when QE was here.  Every DC looks like an All World DC with the genius of sending 6 or 7 defenders.

4a: If it is due to Sark, I would think a frustrated Flood would have a strong conversation directly with Sark by now

4b: If it is due to Flood, why is Sark holding on to the incompetence

5: Sark's offenses haven't had a good track record at Texas in spite of having to nationally rated #1 QBs and Texas resources.  I don't believe Texas has cracked the top 10 in Total offense since he has been here.  Can Sark really develop QBs or is it a myth?  What the hell credentials does Milwee have.  Nothing against Milwee-it is on Sark hiring decision.

6.  Texas never has enough of a lead to allow the backup QB to get meaningful game reps. 

7.  Y'all can help me with the rest

[Hornio]

It’s obviously Arch and he’ll be at UVA