Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Moderators
Posted

The biggest issue for me on Saturday was the lack of positive plays on 1st and 2nd down, which came as a direct result of the lack of running game and costly penalties that kept the Longhorns behind the sticks.

The numbers are awfully ugly when diving into it for the Texas offense.

Texas had 18 3rd down snaps of offensive on Saturday vs. Georgia.

  • 10 needed 9+ yards to convert
  • The average distance was 11.6 yards
  •  only 4 were 3rd & short (1-4 yards)

Quinn Ewers was 9-15 passing for 178 yards, but with two INTs. Those INT came on 3rd & 17 and 3rd & 9.

Texas threw the ball on 16 of their 18 snaps on third downs, taking one sack in the process and obviously throwing the two interceptions that were mentioned above. Both interceptions came on comeback routes to the right side of the field.

In comparison, let's take a look at the Georgia offensive output on third downs:

Of Georgia's 15 third down snaps against the Texas defense:

  • 3rd & short: 5-8
  • 3rd & long: 0-2
  • average distance to go: 5.3

Say what you want about their offensive outputs on Saturday, but Georgia consistently was able to live near the first down marker on third downs.

***

A look at third downs in the high-red area for the Texas offense. (from Georgia's 25-yard line and in)

  • 3rd & 5 – incomplete to Moore
  • 3rd & 10 – Ewers sacked
  • 3rd & 6 – dropped by Wingo
  • 3rd & 5 – pass complete for 6 yards to Moore
  • 3rd & 5 – pass complete for 6 yards to Wingo (Overtime)
  • 3rd & 10 – pass complete for -1 yards to Wisner (Overtime) 

Tough to win games against a great pass rush when you constantly are put in positions where you are forced to throw the ball and gained a lot of yards on a single play.

This was the ultimate achilles heel in my eyes.

  • Hook 'Em 6
  • Thanks 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, Atticus said:

Ohio State has a front that is comparable. Bama is close as well.

I haven't looked at pressure rate numbers, but I don't think OSU pressures the QB as much as Georgia. I know their linebackers don't have the speed of the Georgia linebackers. Their secondary is much better than Georgia, close to ours. 

Posted
28 minutes ago, CJ Vogel said:

A look at third downs in the high-red area for the Texas offense. (from Georgia's 25-yard line and in)

  • 3rd & 5 – incomplete to Moore


The pass to Moore was a bad decision and should have been an INT. Golden wide open underneath for a first down on the same side of the field.

 

  • Confused 1
  • Moderators
Posted
Just now, marathon said:


The pass to Moore was a bad decision and should have been an INT. Golden wide open underneath for a first down on the same side of the field.

 

Yeah that was a miss. His worst throw. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Atticus said:

Ohio State has a front that is comparable. Bama is close as well.

ND, Clemson, Oregon, Penn St, Ohio State, Bama, and Tennessee all have really good fronts. 

Posted

The first seven times we had 4 yards or less to go on 2nd, 3rd, or 4th down we threw the ball.  The only run in the game in that situation was a second and one in the final drive of regulation.  Sark had zero confidence in the running game from the get go. 

Posted
1 hour ago, CJ Vogel said:

The biggest issue for me on Saturday was the lack of positive plays on 1st and 2nd down, which came as a direct result of the lack of running game and costly penalties that kept the Longhorns behind the sticks.

The numbers are awfully ugly when diving into it for the Texas offense.

Texas had 18 3rd down snaps of offensive on Saturday vs. Georgia.

  • 10 needed 9+ yards to convert
  • The average distance was 11.6 yards
  •  only 4 were 3rd & short (1-4 yards)

Quinn Ewers was 9-15 passing for 178 yards, but with two INTs. Those INT came on 3rd & 17 and 3rd & 9.

Texas threw the ball on 16 of their 18 snaps on third downs, taking one sack in the process and obviously throwing the two interceptions that were mentioned above. Both interceptions came on comeback routes to the right side of the field.

In comparison, let's take a look at the Georgia offensive output on third downs:

Of Georgia's 15 third down snaps against the Texas defense:

  • 3rd & short: 5-8
  • 3rd & long: 0-2
  • average distance to go: 5.3

Say what you want about their offensive outputs on Saturday, but Georgia consistently was able to live near the first down marker on third downs.

***

A look at third downs in the high-red area for the Texas offense. (from Georgia's 25-yard line and in)

  • 3rd & 5 – incomplete to Moore
  • 3rd & 10 – Ewers sacked
  • 3rd & 6 – dropped by Wingo
  • 3rd & 5 – pass complete for 6 yards to Moore
  • 3rd & 5 – pass complete for 6 yards to Wingo (Overtime)
  • 3rd & 10 – pass complete for -1 yards to Wisner (Overtime) 

Tough to win games against a great pass rush when you constantly are put in positions where you are forced to throw the ball and gained a lot of yards on a single play.

This was the ultimate achilles heel in my eyes.

Solid look… and the lack of being able to run between the tackles kills in the red zone…

Posted
1 hour ago, tsip92 said:

The first seven times we had 4 yards or less to go on 2nd, 3rd, or 4th down we threw the ball.  The only run in the game in that situation was a second and one in the final drive of regulation.  Sark had zero confidence in the running game from the get go. 

Damn, those numbers aren’t quite right but the general idea still stands. 

Posted
3 hours ago, tsip92 said:

The first seven times we had 4 yards or less to go on 2nd, 3rd, or 4th down we threw the ball.  The only run in the game in that situation was a second and one in the final drive of regulation.  Sark had zero confidence in the running game from the get go. 

With good reason.  The Georgia DL was pimp slapping our OL all game long a Wisner didn’t break any tackles or make any defender miss.  Why would we run the ball when Quinn threw for 358 yards and our run game averaged 1 yard per carry?

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
8 hours ago, JMarquette said:

@CJ Vogel based on what we think the bracket will look like and the remaining teams, is there anyone with an IDL that would handle our IOL like Georgia has? 

Clemson has some of that unfortunately 

  • Hook 'Em 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.