Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, connorkp23 said:

Missing the combine and pro day doesn’t take a 2nd round grade to 7th round / undrafted. Something else there. 

Agree several  ol taken who didn’t even get invited 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Moderators
Posted
Just now, Derek Handler said:

Agree several  ol taken who didn’t even get invited 

I’m just saying, a lack of experience on top of the knee injury being worse than what we’ve been led to believe would contribute to a fall.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)

Honestly our man Gerry did big Cam no favors constantly hyping him as a potential 1st rounder.

In hindsight it was ridiculous that this guy went pro after ~10 starts that all contained backbreaking penalties and pass protection busts.

Not to say that he doesn't have the raw talent, but he obviously needed to come back and play a cleaner year.

Edited by whereiend
  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted

Preface: some of these takes crapping on Quinn and Sark and the shouldacouldawouldas is just trashy. Quinn was great for us. Sark has been great for us.

Furthermore- Quinn did things the right way. He could have taken a multimillion dollar deal somewhere, even Texas Tech, but he wanted to finish his career as a Longhorn. If you truly support this program, support Quinn better because he is a great Longhorn.

that being said, I think the two most important criteria  to consider for NFL QB prospects:

- Gotta either be mobile or have good pocket presence

- Gotta have at least a halfway reliable deep ball

Unfortunately, these are Quinn’s two Achilles’ heels, and the other QBs being selected above him satisfy these two criteria better. 

  • Hook 'Em 8
Posted
1 minute ago, Ace Recruiter said:

At this point, who's the most disappointed? Cam or Quinn?

Both are looking like bad choices to go pro. The question is which of the two is more likely to string enough NFL contracts together to not miss the potential NIL they could have had in 2025.

  • Hook 'Em 3
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, CHorn427 said:

Preface: some of these takes crapping on Quinn and Sark and the shouldacouldawouldas is just trashy. Quinn was great for us. Sark has been great for us.

Furthermore- Quinn did things the right way. He could have taken a multimillion dollar deal somewhere, even Texas Tech, but he wanted to finish his career as a Longhorn. If you truly support this program, support Quinn better because he is a great Longhorn.

that being said, I think the two most important criteria  to consider for NFL QB prospects:

- Gotta either be mobile or have good pocket presence

- Gotta have at least a halfway reliable deep ball

Unfortunately, these are Quinn’s two Achilles’ heels, and the other QBs being selected above him satisfy these two criteria better. 

Who is trashing Sark? I always thought "what if Arch was our starter in 2024?" would go down as a great Texas football what-if, but I understand why Sark did what he did.

I think Sark did really well with Quinn, he just is what he is is which is above average college QB, career backup NFL QB.

 

Arch is obviously much more talented but he lacked experience.

Edited by whereiend
  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
Just now, whereiend said:

Eagles are so good at grabbing the "elite potential but slipped because of xyz" guys...

Yep. As opposed to the Cowboys reaching or drafting players dressed in red flags.

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Bond slipping this far makes me feel like his off the field stuff is pretty bad. We knew he had attitude issues, but that legal case must be pretty bad. 

  • Hook 'Em 1
  • Sad 1
  • Moderators
Posted
Just now, HDub1995 said:

Best possible landing spot for Cam. If anyone can get him to reach his potential, it’s that OL coach. 

No doubt. Jeff Stoutland is a stud.

  • Hook 'Em 6

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.