Skip to content

Three things to consider regarding Laurence Seymore and Texas' left guard competition

College football’s talking season is rife with hyperbole.

Thankfully, Steve Sarkisian shelved coachspeak last month after praising Laurence Seymore for the strides he’s made since joining the Texas program in June. It painted the most realistic picture of what to expect from Seymore when the Longhorns hold their first preseason practice on Wednesday.

“It’s difficult in the summertime. We’re in underwear,” Sarkisian said during his press conference at the Texas High School Coaches Association Convention in Houston. “We'll find out a lot in training camp, especially when we get into the second week, when we're really in full pads and we're getting going. But so far, so good with him.”

If Seymore, a 2025 second-team All-American with 27 career games played and 21 starts over parts of four seasons at Miami, Akron and Western Kentucky, wins the starting job at left guard, he’ll fill the biggest need Texas had on either side of the ball coming out of spring practice.

But Seymore must win the job. It won’t be given to him.

Seymore has to prove to Sarkisian and Kyle Flood that he’s the best option to protect Arch Manning and elevate the running game over Jaydon Chatman, Jackson Christian, Dylan Sikorski and any other challengers Seymore might face in camp.

Before the 6-foot-2-inch, 316-pound Seymore hits the field for the first time in a formal practice with the Longhorns, there are three things to consider regarding the left guard competition:

— Seymore’s presence as a pass blocker could be the most significant upgrade any of the transfer portal additions on offense will bring to the table in 2026.

Seymore’s Pro Football Focus pass-blocking grade of 82.6 ranked 30th among FBS guards with at least 100 pass-blocking snaps last season (eight pressures allowed on 503 opportunities). While he dominated the competition in Conference USA, Seymore also allowed just one pressure on 48 opportunities against LSU and was charged with only one penalty on 840 snaps for the season.

Those are important numbers against the backdrop of what Texas got out of the left guard position in 2025.

According to PFF, the left guard position was responsible for 26.5 percent of the dropbacks on which Manning was pressured. That was the highest percentage of any position on the Texas offensive line and the highest percentage for any FBS offensive line’s left guard spot among the 136 quarterbacks in the country who were pressured on at least 50 dropbacks.

— One of the legitimate questions regarding Seymore’s potential impact is how he’ll operate within Sarkisian’s zone running game.

PFF’s run-blocking grades rated DJ Campbell (73.6) and Cole Hutson (71.6) as better overall run blockers than Seymore (63.9; PFF considers a grade of 70 above average). Of Seymore’s 308 gradable run-blocking snaps, 62.7 percent of them were on gap schemes; on zone runs, Campbell (81.2) and Hutson (74.5) graded out significantly higher than Seymore (60.2).

Seymore should help the Longhorns improve as a gap/power running team. Still, Seymore must be well-rounded enough to keep opponents from successfully attacking a vulnerable part of the line.

— Whether Hutson rejoins the team or not, Chatman, Christian, Sikorski and the other contenders for playing time at left guard have an advantage over Seymore with their varying levels of experience in Sarkisian’s offense.

How fast Seymore absorbs the offense and takes to the field could be the biggest factor in how long the competition lasts. If Seymore needs time to get things down, Sarkisian and Flood could look at other options, some of which could significantly alter the projected depth chart as camp progresses.

Andre Cojoe, Jonte Newman or John Turntine III emerging as a viable third tackle option behind Trevor Goosby and Melvin Siani could lead to Jordan Coleman, who spent the spring at left tackle while Goosby was recovering from shoulder surgery, getting a look at guard.

Not only would Seymore winning the left guard job put the starting five for the Sept. 5 season opener against Texas State in stone, but it would also let Sarkisian and Flood get their depth pieces in order. Maximizing the available depth by turning to the best possible combination in a pinch is pivotal to the offense maintaining consistency and potency during a potential 17-game season, to say the least.

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

JMarquette

Supporters
10 minutes ago, Jeff Howe said:

That’s putting the cart way in front of the horse. 

It’s not when your single offseason objective was to get a left guard who would elevate the offensive line. If Hutson is the answer, Flood deserves to get sh*t canned, and so does sark for that matter.

Joe Z

Supporters
3 minutes ago, JMarquette said:

It’s not when your single offseason was to get a left guard who would elevate the offensive line. If Hutson is the answer, Flood deserves to get sh*t canned, and so does sark for that matter.

This********

JMarquette

Supporters
4 minutes ago, Here for the Wins said:

Here is where I sit.  Not an Oline expert but understand the game.  PFF grades aren’t the end all, be all, but they provide a ton of context when no one can watch all their games.  I understand why people watch only certain games, but that doesn’t convey context of whether that’s the standard game or a players best game or worst game.

I will reiterate one of my points from several weeks ago.  That essentially came up today.  Our supposed strengths of the Oline last year had too many errors to start the season.  It’s asinine to focus on the least experienced guy when versus OSU the majority of the big downs that we failed to execute was off the right side.  Most teams 5th guy is mediocre at best.  Go look at Ole Miss blocking grades.  Compare our offensive output to Miamis, and they were universally a top 3 unit.

LT, C, and Baker should all start better than we were a year ago.  If Baker has a single with either 5 pressures or 2 penalties, I’d be surprised.  And that was just OSU last year.  Siani should ready.  And the pass blocking efficiency outside of one LG was in a normality range.  That alone works with this team.  And without looking, our highest yards per carry last year came at the LG area.  I’m not saying that’s because the LG but rather you can still make some hay even if you don’t have a plus player.

And underappreciated last year was the return home. That helped the offense but also Sark opened up the screen game.  Sub-10% versus OSU/UF, 20% versus Vandy.  Our gameplans seemingly focused on us.  Outliers early were UTEP at 70/30 run-pass and UF average depth of target at 20 yards.  OSU didn’t replicate either.  So a ln inexperienced team and we’re rolling different gameplans.  I’m reasonably confident UF and Kentucky used their bye weeks to attack differently too.

So that’s a lot of words to say if LG stands out, it’s likely because of unexpected issues elsewhere.

There’s some truth to this, but Stroh was objectively horrible. This shouldn’t be hard to admit, yet it is for you. Additionally, your description of how the OL works is inaccurate. It’s a “you’re only as strong as your weakest link” type of mentality. You can have 4 studs, but 1 dud ruins it. There were OL problems outside of LG, but the VAST majority was LG.

  • Moderators
24 minutes ago, Joe Zura said:

No not at all stating facts. He was awful as a center like beyond awful he was a beyond mid LG and if you try and tell me I’m wrong you will forever be known as sunshine pumper Howe 😭💀

I don’t know if anyone has suggested that Hutson will start. I don’t see the point in worrying about something that might not (and probably won’t) happen, barring something unforeseen.

  • Moderators
24 minutes ago, JMarquette said:

It’s not when your single offseason objective was to get a left guard who would elevate the offensive line. If Hutson is the answer, Flood deserves to get sh*t canned, and so does sark for that matter.

I get the sentiment, but I don’t think Hutson starting is something to get worked up over right now.

Joe Z

Supporters
5 minutes ago, Jeff Howe said:

I don’t know if anyone has suggested that Hutson will start. I don’t see the point in worrying about something that might not (and probably won’t) happen, barring something unforeseen.

Jeff you don’t want this let’s both get some sleep deal?!

  • Moderators
1 minute ago, Joe Zura said:

Jeff you don’t want this let’s both get some sleep deal?!

In all seriousness, I don’t think this is something that’s that deep. All I’m saying is that I’m willing to let Seymore get through one practice and figure if/when Hutson will be with the team before concerning myself with scenarios that might not happen. 

Joe Z

Supporters
1 minute ago, Jeff Howe said:

In all seriousness, I don’t think this is something that’s that deep. All I’m saying is that I’m willing to let Seymore get through one practice and figure if/when Hutson will be with the team before concerning myself with scenarios that might not happen. 

I agree Jeff but I have to keep the fight going you understand that part. But I do agree the OL will be better but people here that see me one way lol 

  • Moderators
1 minute ago, Joe Zura said:

I agree Jeff but I have to keep the fight going you understand that part. But I do agree the OL will be better but people here that see me one way lol 

Yep. It’s a concern until it’s not.

Joe Z

Supporters
2 minutes ago, Jeff Howe said:

Yep. It’s a concern until it’s not.

🤘🤘🤘🤘🤘

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Add a comment...

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.