I have a two part question that I was hoping that Gerry, Bobby or CJ could discuss. Either on Coffee & Football or in this tread if they are able. Anyone else for that matter who cares to provide their thoughts and insight would be welcomed.
After listening to Gerry & CJ on the recruiting breakdown yesterday, it got me thinking about our quarterback of the future. Quinn will be gone after the 2024 season. We all assume that Arch will be the starter for 2025 & 2026 season. What about 2027? I say 2027 because neither of Arch’s uncles declared early for the draft. Both stayed to finish out their eligibility I believe. Unlike Quinn who skipped his senior year to start his NFL clock early, Arch seems to want to enjoy his college experience and playing college football. With that being the case, how far out is it that Arch may stay for four or even five years? Technically, he redshirted last year. So that would mean he is entering the 2024 season as a redshirt freshman. Now, if UT goes on a wins a national championship in either 2024 or 2025, he would not really have a reason to return. However, depending on the talent around him, do you think Arch may use all his eligibility? I know most guys would bolt for NFL money, but the Mannings are on a different timeline than most people.
Which brings me to my second question. Who out of Bell or Lacy would be the next man up? Not discounting Trey Owens as he is currently on campus. But out of Lacy and Bell, who is more talented to run Sarks offense? Who is more likely to still be around in 2027? Dia Bell has only been committed for a short period of time, but he strikes me as someone who may be willing to be a bit more patient than Lacy. I only say this because Lacy was looking around after he committed to UT. I know he has firmed up his commitment recently, but if Arch was to stay until 2027, would Lacy be willing to wait that long to take over. I would say no, but just curious what everyone else thinks.