-
Posts
698 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Texas Longhorns News
2025 Recruits
2024 Schedule
2026 Recruits
2025 Schedule
Gallery
Downloads
Forums
Blogs
Store
Everything posted by Bevo92
-
Agree. Will be interesting to see how Tech performs in 2025/2026 across all sports, but especially football, given their supposed #1 class from the transfer portal. For all of Joey McGuire’s big talk over the past several years about championships running through west Texas, he’s yet to do anything on the field where it matters/. In softball, their strategy almost worked till it imploded in the first inning of game 3 and ran out of gas.
-
Paying 7 figures for a softball player
Bevo92 replied to Hookem1012's topic in On Texas Football Forum
No way Tech gets anywhere near as far this season without riding Canaday. Brilliant move imho. Equally brilliant to I’ll deal on Friday with Canaday for next season, meaning the deal cannot be reviewed or revoked by Deloitte/. They get another shot to go for it in 2026. -
Ok, as I'm reading more on the terms of the House -v- NCAA, a few additional points I think I now understand. Today is my first day back from vacation so I'm catching up a bit on my daily OTF. lol. A few points for additional clarity. Gerry or Bobby, please correct me if I'm misrepresenting anything here: 1) Any NIL deal signed under contract prior to last Friday night at midnight will not be challenged. Those deals are effective and in place and they do not count against the $20.5m cap because they are from the collective and not from the school. Is that correct? So theoretically, the team currently could have $25m worth of contracts in place with the NIL and all of those are still in effect IN ADDITION to the fact that the University can now begin paying an the $20.5m for this upcoming school year. That is different than what I originally understood but it makes sense as a bridge to the future. For Canaday as an example, since she signed her NIL last Friday for another $1m next year from the collective, it's good and enforceable and won't conflict with the payments from the university. 2) All new NIL deals (whether it's from collectives or from companies directly) will have to be submitted into the review / approval process for Deloitte to administer and approve if the total value exceeds $600. So for Arch, his Redbull contract won't get reviewed that he's already executed; however if his next deal is ready to be signed this week, he'll need sign-off by the new sports commission and Deloitte before he can officially execute the agreement and receive payment. 3) This seems to be a clear case of WTF when it comes to Deloitte determining 'market value' for these NIL deals. Arch signing a $5m deal with Rolex may be easier to approve than a $1m deal with Ray's Used Cars for weekly 11p commercial spot. Btw, that $1m from Ray's Used Cars probably got funded from a booster and how is Deloitte going to make that discovery to realize the NIL payor is actually just the middle man and the billion dollar booster is the true funding source? How in the heck will Deloitte have any chance of actually maintaining some kind of market integrity? What does that even mean to be in compliance?
-
OTF Premium Three afternoon recruiting nuggets (6:04pm CST)
Bevo92 replied to Gerry Hamilton's topic in On Texas Football Forum
As I speculated in my prior note, I'm officially brain dead today after returning from vacation last week. Thanks for clarifying. That makes the UOV look even better. 🤘🏼 -
OTF Premium Three afternoon recruiting nuggets (6:04pm CST)
Bevo92 replied to Gerry Hamilton's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Interesting that Lamar Brown's trip mid-week is an unofficial visit in 9 days. Is that Texas keeping their official visit available for the fall? Curious why it's a UOV? Maybe Gerry already explained or I'm being slow on a Monday afternoon. lol. -
With Greg Sankey and Pete Bevacqua (ND AD) meeting with Trump yesterday, it will be interesting to see if there's federal anti-trust legislation or some type of federal protections put in place that would give universities and this new College Sports Commission the protections and authority they need to support this new proposed financial structure with caps as outlined. Otherwise, the lawsuits are likely to be out of control this fall between title IX and any player claiming they are being harmed financially as a result of the new rules.
-
I know this has been getting talked about since last fall when the initial ruling came out, but now that it's official, this is going to be fascinating to watch unfold. Given the effective date of July 1, 2025, there is no grace period it appears. It is IMMEDIATELY in effect this school year regardless of what NIL agreements schools have with their players going into the 2025/2026 school year. Is that others' understanding as well? How will universities have the contractual right to revise or even terminate agreements that are binding contracts with its players?
-
Awesome!! Thanks for posting. Love it. Would be great for Ojo to commit after this coming weekend!! 🧡🐂🤘
-
A brief summary from ChatGPT outlining key elements of the House -v- NCAA Settlement. This ruling goes into effect on July 1, 2025 and all universities must comply for this upcoming school year. In other words, if a university has total financial commitments for its athletes that exceed $20.5m across all sports (yes, Texas Tech, I'm talking about you with your $1m annual payment to a single pitcher in Canaday plus your extreme overpayments in the transfer portal), their total payments must be adjusted this summer in order to be in compliance. Otherwise, lack of compliance appears to create opening for massive penalties and other punitive actions. Also, it's important to note the ruling does not provide any contractual relief or carve-out provisions that would contractually allow universities to revise signed agreements. Seems to be a Catch-22. It's easy to see all of this quickly leading back into the courtroom as players will understandably feel they have an enforceable contract that cannot simply be terminated or adjusted without offsetting remedies to the player being harmed financially. Question for @Bobby Burton and @Gerry Hamilton. Will you have your expert back on OTF in the near future that you had on the show a month or two ago re: the settlement impacts? I can't recall the guy's name but I seem to recall Bobby made the connection in the spring and he answered a lot of questions in advance of the final ruling coming out. Would be great to get a credible perspective on how this all will unfold for Texas and others. I feel good knowing how CDC is prepared and proactive to address things like this. Seems like UT will likely benefit more than most, given legitimate NIL upside for players in all sports beyond the $20.5m cap. Hook em!! 🧡🐂🤘
-
Love it!! 🧡🐂🤘🏼
-
Summary article from ESPN… https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/45467505/judge-grants-final-approval-house-v-ncaa-settlement New Commissioner of College Sports announced…NCAA no longer in charge of rule enforcement. https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/45468012/mlb-exec-bryan-seeley-ceo-new-college-sports-commission?consent_mode=ccpa
-
Paying 7 figures for a softball player
Bevo92 replied to Hookem1012's topic in On Texas Football Forum
I can imagine the Sellers (alumni couple who contributed $11m, including $1m to improve softball field and $1m for Canaday) probably feel this is the best investment they’ve ever made. Puts Tech on the sports map and made them relevant. The university has to be loving the publicity this has given them. I’m impressed they were able to turn around the program in 1 yr. -
Texas v Texas Tech WCWS Game 2 - Let’s get it started!!
Bevo92 replied to Bevo92's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Flashing back 2 weeks to the Clemson late night extra innings nail biter game 2 when Clemson had runners on 2nd and 3rd in the bottom of the 8th inning with no outs, game tied 5-5. 80% probability in that moment at least one run scores for Clemson, our season ends right then…. but Kavan and the defense were f’ing clutch with a strikeout and 2 great defensive plays for the last 2 outs, inning over with no runs. Horns won it in the 10th after holding Clemson scoreless in final 2 innings. Texas went on to battle game 3 and win the series. That super regional series showed a ton of character and fight in Texas. Same thing in game 1 against Tech in the first inning with bases loaded and no outs. Tech should have been able to generate at least a run or two in that inning. Instead, Kavan and the Horms got Canaday to hit into double play plus the third out, no damage and the Horns went on to win the greatest game I can recall in awesome fashion on Atwoods clutch 2RBI single in the 9th. Bottom line, our Lady Longhorns have major grit and in this game 3 against Texas Tech tonight for the chance to win their first ever WCWS, I’m excited to see that Longhorn grit in full force. Minimize the errors and self inflicted mistakes. Kavan should pitch well with the day’s rest and the Horns should be ready to hit on Cannaday tonight (note, that’s f’ing impressive that Canaday is carrying the full load 3 straight straight days from the mound). My prediction on final score: Texas wins 6-5 in extra innings on a solo HR by Mia Scott. Texas wins their first ever WCWS. Hook em! 🧡🐂🤘🏼 -
This type of injury for a speed receiver like Stewart is extremely tough to come back to same level of elite speed. Can’t think of anyone who has done it. Jimmy Graham tore his patellar tendon in 2015 and was never the same/. Even when players return, they almost always lose their elite burst. Sucks for him and any athlete.
-
Texas v Texas Tech WCWS Game 2 - Let’s get it started!!
Bevo92 replied to Bevo92's topic in On Texas Football Forum
Forecast currently shows rain in the morning but dry by afternoon. Our much bigger issue tonight was all the sloppy issues fielding. Self inflicted loss tonight.