All Activity

Didn’t you hear we forfeit this season and are on to next haven’t you seen the board the last few weeks 🤣

I doubt Mosely is a starter when he comes back. He'll probably rotate at x and z.

Sark has his recievers learn all positions. So it's not necessarily who comes out, but more how does the rotation go. It all depends on what Sark wants out of certain plays. You can get an infinite amount of combinations of Mosely, Livingstone, Wingo, and Moore who are the lead recievers right now.

Another good test for the young team.

Who is coming out for Mosely when he is healthy, and is it a positive trade off? If we go 10, Endries? who is a solid threat or If we go 11 or 12, Livingstone? (who is our "best" wr right now possibly) Just a thought.

Thank for sharing. This chart summarizes all the discussion points in the posts above very succinctly. And there are some profound implications: * today, there are 65 teams across the P4 conferences (inc ND). If only 18 teams generate half the media revenue of the entire D1 (140 schools), that implies that 47 schools in P4 conferences are being somewhat subsidized by the big 18 revenue schools. If you prefer softer language, 47 schools currently in P4 are receiving outsized media revenue relative to their own individual media revenue value. * it also implies that more than half of the current P2 schools (SEC and Big Ten collectively are 34 schools today) are below average contributors to their own conferences media revenue. Note; there are 15 current P2 schools on the list of 18 schools above. In other words, even within the P2 conferences, 15 schools pull more than half the revenue weight of the other 18 schools. This is what I mean when I state the next great battle in college sports may be WITHIN the P2 conferences. Think Vandy, Rutgers, Minnesota, or Northwestern being a part of the final 40-48 schools of major college football. Hmm… * Once the largest ACC schools (Clemson, FSU, UNC) are added to the mix, it’s doubtful that any other ACC or Big 12 schools will be above mean (average) contributors to the media revenue generation of the major college football league. NONE! This is why the biggest 18-20 schools will be very reluctant to expand the P2 conferences beyond the 40-48 schools mentioned above. * To bring things full circle, you now should understand why Cody Campbell is worried about the future of Texas Tech. Keep in mind, Campbell is now the Chairman of the Board of Trustees at Tech, not just some football booster. His school’s future is predicated on being part of the finalized major college football league in 2031, and he realizes he’ll be part of the “subsidized” group of schools, NOT the group of outsized revenue generators. And that’s going to be a tough sell for a Lubbock, TX school.

Like that speed.

If he plays this right, Michigan will start outrecruiting Ohio State and Oregon on a regular basis. That has not been the case for most of my lifetime. Not sure if they have the right coaching staff in place to maximize that talent, but something to watch over the next few recruiting cycles.

Or Georgia or Kentucky.

2027 Lakeview Centennial (Texas) cornerback Montre Jackson tells OTF he will be visiting the Texas Longhorns this weekend for the matchup against UTEP. Jackson is currently ranked as the No. 20 cornerback in the country and No. 178 player in the country by 247Sports. He tells OTF that he remains in contact with the Texas staff regularly and now he will be in Austin for a game visit. The Garland native possesses elite speed, boasting a 10.39 wind-aided 100m in the spring. In April, Jackson clocked a wind-legal 10.53 100m. The four-star cornerback was at Oklahoma last weekend and the Longhorns will have their crack at impressing one of the top prospects in DFW.

Larry Ellison now richest person in the world. Prepare for more money bags at Michigan

So in the way I look at it, DJ and Neto are who they are going to be, but can the guys around them come into the players they will become? From there they get better not individually, but collectively. That goes for all groups, both sides of the ball, and as a team. Fact is Texas may end up better in some areas than others. The more they set the standard of who they are to become the more we can hold them to that and judge from there. We can't expect a team to just be who we think they should be when they show us who and what they are. Is all I'm saying.

Yes this I agree with. I included all 4 conferences in the original FBS1 talk track as a handful of programs in the ACC and Big 12 will be selected to make their way over and how else do we reference them than by their current name.

its an interesting theory how much a position group can improve vs how much latent talent they have. On one hand you have five star generational LTs like Banks that didn’t take long at all to lock in and then you have players that are just never going to be talented enough to meet a championship level standard no matter how much coaching is involved. And then there are the inbetweens. One can hope we have the latent talent along the OL that can become championship level standard but a few of the dudes like DJ and Neto have been around long enough that I think we know their upside.

You just wait for it pal that’s all I’m saying 🤣🤣🤣🤣

The ACC as we know it will be going away in 2031. There’s no need to consider the B12 after the few valuable schools (ASU, Utah, Colorado) leave that conference to force their way into the P2 after the ACC dissolves in 2031. So, the “FSB1” you propose above really needn’t consider the ACC nor B12 as conferences to include in it. It’ll be two conferences, and any membership from current ACC or B12 schools will be highly restrictive and selective.

I'm not arguing 🤣. I'm having a conversation.