All Activity

Putting aggy in that group is the joke. We will score much more than that on them this year. They gave up 24 to UTSA or to them ASTU. Typical free rent in Loser Lucci's head.

Can we just take Notre Dame's redzone offense? Seems to work for them... 😅

I get your point. You're saying his performance was worse than off, i.e. really bad to terrible. 17 of 30 with one TD and one INT isn't really bad or terrible. He made six or seven bad throws. I watched LeNorris Sellers play earlier today and he made more than a dozen bad throws. His team won because they were playing Virginia Tech rather than Ohio State. He won't be blasted in the media or by his fanbase.

I think you missed my point....there is an off performance and whatever that was yesterday was far worse than an off performance.

Until or unless it's repeated a few times, it's an off performance. We've seen Arch's fundamental footwork and throwing mechanics, and we saw it at times yesterday. That doesn't simply disappear because of half a dozen throws in one game. Given that Arch has been fundamentally sound for years, it seems more likely that this game was the outlier, not the years leading up to it.

If Arch is the qb and leader we think he is, no way this performance sits well with him. I'm excited as to what comes next from him.

I can't stand A&M or Liucci, but he cooked with this take imo. Where are the 40+ ppg offenses we saw from him as the OC at Alabama? Based on the concerns about not having any touchdown makers on this offense, that won't change this season and probably next season unless they find guys like that in the portal. Gotta see how the offense looks after Red River and go from there, but most likely, the red zone and short yardage issues will continue. Maybe he starts taking the 3 points if we're lucky.

But lets be honest about yesterday, there is an off performance then there is whatever that was IMO.

@Gerry Hamilton been preaching this message dang near daily, actually.

He's not wrong. Offense has been the weaker unit of offense and defense in the Sark tenure outside of year 1. For being such an offensive genius and playcaller we have not fielded a single top 10 offense

What are your thoughts on this clowns take?

That was literally their game plan. They were going to let us run between 20s and not get beat deep while keeping everything in front of them.

Option 1 : Condense the formations and play old school Alabama run football. Make the defense dictate what they half to do and utilize our receivers in the outside without our QB having to read against 7 to 8 defenders. We recruited big receivers so use them. Run it up their ass and throw it to our studs without our QB having to do math every play. Once he’s ready, open it up more. Until then, play old school and do what you got to do to win. Option 2: run the exact offense he would with Quinn.

Option 3: Tailor the offense to the strengths of Arch's athleticism.

Option 1 : Condense the formations and play old school Alabama run football. Make the defense dictate what they half to do and utilize our receivers in the outside without our QB having to read against 7 to 8 defenders. We recruited big receivers so use them. Run it up their ass and throw it to our studs without our QB having to do math every play. Once he’s ready, open it up more. Until then, play old school and do what you got to do to win. Option 2: run the exact offense he would with Quinn.

Watching Miami right now and FSU yesterday, something that stood out was the simple scheme of getting superior athletes the ball in space and letting them create. Sark did that often with Worthy and Bond. Short misdirection routes and let your athletes create. Any reason that was abandoned last game until the 4th Q?

@CJ Vogel @Jeff Howe @Gerry Hamilton Could one of yall try to get an explanation on why not a single punt was fielded and we kept allowing their punt unit to get 10-20 yards of extra field position? That field position difference could be the choice between opting for a field goal, going for it on 4th, or punting

I completely agree, General. After watching the film breakdown of Arch’s game, his mechanics were poor, and he made several bad reads, particularly early on. He did show improvement as the game progressed.

Sark never “sold himself” as anything remotely close to that. Get out of here with that BS.

I wonder how long Peyton’s voicemails were last night/today.

Nah....he's not that type of receiver IMO.

Option 1 : Condense the formations and play old school Alabama run football. Make the defense dictate what they half to do and utilize our receivers in the outside without our QB having to read against 7 to 8 defenders. We recruited big receivers so use them. Run it up their ass and throw it to our studs without our QB having to do math every play. Once he’s ready, open it up more. Until then, play old school and do what you got to do to win. Option 2: run the exact offense he would with Quinn.

This is absolutely brutal to watch.

I agree…I wasn’t overly impressed with the speed/game breaking ability of our offense. I wish we would go break the bank for Jalen Lott because he is the type of prospect we are missing.