All Activity

This video breakdown comes from our friend Brooks Austin, the Film Guy. It's a 25-minute, detailed breakdown of Arch vs Mississippi State. It's really well done. We'll see Brooks down in Atlanta at SEC media days and ask him to join us one morning.

Ehh, let's see how he does without Penix and a stacked team of veterans. He didn't exactly cover himself in glory last year at all.

And Xavier Worthy’s broken hand.

Maybe Capt. Kirk was wrong and space is not the final frontier. By the way, Happy National Pecan Pie Day!

Thanks for posting. I wonder about the immediate effect it will have. Does the player not receive funds during the appeal? Will they throw up their hands and surrender? Then what? Stay at the school that built a relationship around bag money that isn’t there or transfer and loop back around to the schools that offered more development and long term possibilities? How does a coaching staff feel about the character and the culture in the locker room? Lots of questions, which will take some time to answer while college football can hang in the balance.

So, exactly, what are you saying?

For those that accused me of having my head in the sand… 😉

Thanks for posting!

Talk about living behind the times yikes. Him and Dabo finally figured out where the game was going. Dabo at least had talent on his team.

Full stats

What can I say 🤣

IF and it’s a big if we can land him the past month will be completely forgiven in my book

@CJ Vogelcan we get your rankings?

Lord, I have seen what you have done for others and I am asking for you to bless me with this.

Honestly, he might be a better Pavia. I think the difference between OU and Vandy are night and day. If Vandy goes 8 - 4, they might build a statue of Pavia and their coach gets an extension. If OU goes 8 - 4 (with a loss to Texas), Mateer is most likely a disappointment and BV is possibly gone.

Don't forget Penix went nuclear in that game as well. That was the only matchup that they could have drawn to keep them from getting a natty. They would have dog walked Michigan.

@Beard N Balls Bundle, thanks for posting!

A YouTube channel is a legitimate business entity and appearances could be paid as such

Maybe they should get rid of Kentucky, Mizzou, and Miss. St. in football and bring back original members Tulane and Sewanee. 🤣

NIce

Wuensch! RIP

Cool!

Thanks for sharing. 🤘

Bill Wyman - not only an excellent football player but bass player for the Rolling Stones for 30 years!

I was going to post something similar from an article New NIL enforcement targets collectives, deals must serve ‘valid business purpose’ in The Athletic (paywall) - the NIL Go dudes are turning down almost all the collective proposed deals. Lawyers, who supposedly were paid $750,000,000 litigating the original House settlement, are already drawing up battle lines for the next round of lawsuits - Plaintiffs’ lawyers in House v. NCAA settlement to get roughly $750 million in fees (paywall). One question I had was what are the consequences if agents simply ignore the NIL Go rules? Supposedly the payments would be banned but what happens to the player and the school if they simply do it anyway? Or pay the parents instead of the recruit? I couldn't find any enforcement mechanisms or clear cut rules for penalties. Without subpoena power (the fatal flaw of the NCAA Compliance team) to check banking records it's hard to see how this might be enforced. some quotes: [quote] The goal is to prevent schools from utilizing booster-driven entities to funnel payments to recruits and transfers as a workaround to the $20.5 million revenue-sharing cap. Guidance issued Thursday by the College Sports Commission said that “an entity with a business purpose of providing payments or benefits to student-athletes or institutions, rather than providing goods or services to the general public for profit, does not satisfy the valid business purpose requirement set forth in NCAA Rule 22.1.3.” It then cited as an example a collective that “reach(es) a deal with a student-athlete to make an appearance on behalf of the collective at an event, even if that event is open to the general public, and the collective charges an admission fee (e.g., a golf tournament).” And, “The same collective’s deal with a student-athlete to promote the collective’s sale of merchandise to the public would not satisfy the valid business purpose requirement for the same reason.” ... In a series of posts on X on Thursday, Dalton K. Forsythe, director of Utah State’s Blue A Collective, criticized NIL Go for technical issues, then said, “We’re hearing from peers across the country: nearly 100 percent of collective-backed NIL deals are being denied, regardless of size or structure.” He continued, “The College Sports Commission has taken the position that collectives cannot serve a ‘valid business purpose’ — a standard that was never clearly communicated before implementation.” ... (the Collectives have joined forces to fight this. Here's a statement they issued): “Today’s commentary from the College Sports Commission regarding ‘true NIL’ and ‘valid business purposes’ is not only misguided, but deeply dismissive of the collective organizations and the tens of thousands of fans and donors who fuel them,” The Collective Association said in a statement. “Any attempt to delegitimize the role collectives play in today’s collegiate athletics landscape ignores both legal precedent and economic reality.” [/quote] Lawsuits, I smell lawsuits.