Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. I was sitting between the uprights for the game winning kick. such an awesome memory and game. Grand daddy of em all
  3. I bet it’s higher than that 15 players out of the portal sounds right.
  4. If that is truly our portal budget in an "all in" year then that is incredibly low given how many needs we have.
  5. Aaron Rodgers was never given a first round receiver in green bay.
  6. Bobby litterally said not long ago that Texas is gonna spend between 6 and 8 million in the portal, an average of 500+k if we take 15 guys, which is the high end on what anyone is gonna spend in the portal. We're not blowing almost half of the budget on a WR.
  7. They have certainly shown up the last week or so.
  8. No no let the keyboard warrior GM do there thing is funny
  9. Texas is not spending 2.5 3 million on a WR guys, the sooner you guys accept that the less painful it'll be when goes somewhere else
  10. Think about Brady and, to some extent, Romo (that’s my quarterback). They made WR look good. We need OL and RB. The WRs simply aren’t as important for the offense to be great next year. Getting an #A1 WR while not getting an #A1 OL is useless.
  11. I never said we can't or wouldn't upgrade the receiver room. I'm saying it isn't and shouldn't be a priority. You will/should upgrade that room solely with experience from existing players and the right fit with portal guys. That room didn't get upgraded from the previous season and it still isn't a glaring problem. The OL and an early season Arch was/is the problem. Arch was fixed. The OL with 4 new starters this season, mostly inexperienced, and a RB room that left a lot to be desired and not really a fit for the scheme are the biggest issues on the offense. Flashy, expensive wide receivers will do little to help the offense if you don't address the other problems by priority.
  12. He thinks this is nil from 2 years ago
  13. My thing with A&M flirting with high dollar WR is pretty simple. Until they get a quarterback that’s able to consistently complete 10 yard passes, none of their moves mean anything to me.
  14. Curious how you think it’s possible to pay everyone
  15. Agree and posted this exact sentiment.
  16. Coleman for 1 and it’s not close. The problem with the Wilson line of thinking is that there will be another renegotiation next year.
  17. It would be really funny if tech money whips A&M for Coleman I can see Texas tech paying what he wants.
  18. Coleman because he is the better player in Arch's final year.
  19. Dallas Wilson battled 2 foot injuries this year only playing in 4 games and only had 12 catches(6 of those vs us). Give me Coleman for one year, easily.
  20. It’s an interesting dynamic. Peoples way of thinking. So many QBs issues can be tied to protection.
  21. Would you rather pay Dallas Wilson $1.5 mil and have him for 2 years or Cam Coleman $2 mil for 1? Btw I’d be surprised it it’s not aggy for Coleman. If nothing else we should try to drive their price up
  22. probably doesn't make sense for us to go after Coleman but if it means keeping him away from aggy and bama it might be worth it
  23. These are the type of people that argue with the gps when its talking to them. Turn left at the light, NO ITS RIGHT!!!!!!!!!
  24. You’re saying this as if everyone is saying the OL doesn’t need to be upgraded. We all know it does. Every single person here thinks the OL needs big upgrades. That doesn’t mean we can’t also want upgrades at WR.
  25. Bama reporter on TOS said he doesn’t expect Bama to be a player in the Coleman sweepstakes.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.