Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. All the bs he went through this year is gonna pay off . 31 TDs this year. And honestly he should be closer to 40 if not for the drops and early season struggles. Just the thought of a run game and a seasoned offensive line around arch should scare the piss out of next years opponents.
  3. Okay we can't just take very decommit and portal OL that shows up lol. It looks like we did have an offer out to him, but so did every other big time program. If he's from Cali, I probably look to see him land at a program around there. USC, Oregon, Washington, etc. Maybe even Utah or BYU.
  4. Good deal. I'm not sure what your endgame is here, but go on, I guess.
  5. I wish. This dude is a stud.
  6. I'm not a big soccer fan, let alone women's soccer, but I had been following a long with a user on reddit that was posting about the games and it seemed like we were struggling big time this year. Wish the old coach all the best and hope we hire a good replacement. I see a lot of people talking about the UCLA HC? Can anyone give a brief overview of why that is a better hire than what we had?
  7. Was probably the most underachieving program at Texas. Change long overdue
  8. It feels like Texas is the team that needs to be all-in after coming up short. Hope it goes more like it did for Ohio State last season and not Penn State this season. It's up to Sark to push the right buttons.
  9. we really need better designation on why players decide to leave a program. Was this truly a de-commitment? Or did Bama withdraw their offer? Or did he get a better offer somewhere closer to home? I guess in the latter case, it's actually a de-commitment. Just more and more, players leave a program because they effectively got cut, and it should be reported as such. We're no longer dealing with "good kids that play an armature sport". We're talking about fully paid professionals here. More importantly, are we in play?
  10. But as I said, what I read is that he was found to have done no wrong doing in a court of law? Was that before or after the texts leaked?
  11. Doesn't mean much in this context.
  12. No more corn dogs and mayo for you Herry. One can dream for Richard Anderson
  13. Do we pursue?!
  14. Guys - let's direct all this angst towards aggy next Friday. 🤘
  15. just gotta look into his texts that leaked and that says everything. Even if he was the scapegoat he still knew what was going on and took the money over doing the right thing.
  16. I don't have a problem with the hire, don't have a dog in the fight, so to speak. From what I've read about the situation, wasn't he found to have no wrong doing in a court of law? I mean the University is the one who covered it up and they pretty much got a slap on the wrist and kept it pushing. Briles is the one who bore the brunt of the punishment and was scapegoated, along with several other key figures. In saying all that, he deserves a chance at redemption and should be heavily monitored. That's just what I've read about the situation, so I could be wrong.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.