Jump to content

PaulieD

Supporters
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2045

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About PaulieD

  • Birthday 03/22/1954

Recent Profile Visitors

3284 profile views

PaulieD's Achievements

Lifetime Longhorn

Lifetime Longhorn (9/9)

  • One Year In
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • One Month Later
  • Very Popular
  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

2.8k

Reputation

  1. PaulieD
    When he said "burning", I immediately thought of Anusol HC, that'll soothe that burnin'
  2. PaulieD
    That was one helluva read, Mathew M. I can sill tell you are burnt orange through and through. HookEm! I have never been as proud of my university as I am now. OH YEAH - aggy - it has NOTHING to do with you guys.🤘
  3. PaulieD
    olden miss 35, Texas 28
  4. PaulieD
    🦆
  5. PaulieD
    I've already fired myself, M. Didn't work, I still have to work around the house, etc. Dammit.
  6. PaulieD
    This is a nothing burger, IMHO. Coach probably gave him the green light, playing with their minds as far as "who's Texas gonna start at QB?"
  7. PaulieD
    yes, we need more emotion from the coaches and players, and no, it won't help Arch one darn bit. He just can't operate Sark's elaborate offenses. Hell I'm not sure anyone can, especially without a Saban/Alabama type OL.
  8. PaulieD
    We need more of this, and none of the post game talks like you were talking to the girls 5th grade soccer team.
  9. PaulieD
    OK
  10. PaulieD
    That actually makes a lot of sense - it's the reverse of 'the run sets up the pass' theory. When the opposing D knows that the short pass scenario is non existent they can concentrate on the run.
  11. PaulieD
    What quarter will we see Lacey enter the game?
  12. PaulieD
    It's hard to coach a QB when you are the HC; Coach doesn't get that.
  13. PaulieD
    I had to turn this off b/c it was literally making me ill. Arch has some college fb version of PTSD. My take on how we should proceed - internal meeting with Arch explaining this (of course he wants to play, if he was concussed we would proceed the same way) followed by him sitting out the game - or at least first half - and building the confidence of the rest of the team.
  14. PaulieD
    Why, for telling the truth? He is shellshocked, and whether it's on him or on our coach's elaborate schemes doesn't matter.
  15. PaulieD
    The reasons for Lacey are thus: Sark's inefficiency in play calling has caused hesitancy and confusion in his QB and also in the OL; confidence is at an all time low. Changing to Lacey forces Sark to simplify the offensive scheme, and they would function well, gaining confidence through the first half. It would spread like a virus.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.