All Activity

Oh I've had one for years I'm sure it's fine 😉

Their 3rd WR btw

You can draw multiple conclusions from the video. Cam is on their campus today, yes. Tech also signed a Pitt WR minutes before that was posted. One seems more likely than the other timing wise.

Would make sense to me especially how this portal season has went lol. I mean we’re taking a B/C level rb, and now we’re after a Vandy receiver is mid, and little 12 edge lol. I think now we are just chasing a commitment at this point. This staff outside of special team and banks is getting their ass’s whooped.

What I am seeing is we are back to playing by the rules (hearing similar about Ohio State) and trying to follow a rev share cap (17M at the most) while other schools like Oregon and Texas Tech are continuing to pay players through the loosely defined NIL rules to pay players above the “cap”. My legal understanding of house v NCAA is that it’s only a cap on rev share dollars. I expected us to spend above the cap because the NIL deal review is BS and illegal market intervention. But it seems we are taking the moral high road and only using rev share and letting NIL be true NIL deals for the players (comes from outside the program which therefore does not help recruiting). There goes our advantage of being the most financially valuable CFB program. The way that the market is playing out, your 2nd string at Texas can go play rn at Baylor or Wake Forest or Pitt for around $100k-200k more than what UT would pay because they all have around the same rev share cash. If you stay within the cap, even the Bluest of blue bloods can only pay their starters because their starters have a higher market value than other schools. The ROI for the risk on HS recruits sucks. It’s extra risky to pay a 5 star. Almost like the Indiana model better of going for 24 YOs with proven production than risky and inexperienced freak athletes. The age of parady is upon us. As a UT fan I think it’s BS that the most valuable program has to compete on the same cap rules with a UNLV, Maryland, or USF. They can, in theory, offer Cam Coleman as much rev share dollars as UT. A good NIL program, development, relationships, and facilities are the differentiator now. @CJ Vogel @Bobby Burton @Gerry Hamilton am I understanding this new world right?

I’m developing a twitch in my left eye. Pretty sure it’s from these portal threads

Rumor has it Gerry still had 20/20 vision on January 1st.

No offense to the kid from Pitt but they’re not putting out a video for him 🤣🤣🤣

They just signed a Pitt wr transfer about an hour ago, a few minutes before this was posted.

Anyone want to pitch in on hiring an Etsy witch to turn this around?

That time of day.

I’m cruising along

Sark should have come out with Texas' best offer on the visit - if he left, take it as a no and move on. Make the moving on public so they cannot use Texas' offer to get more somewhere else.

He’s probably secretly working for kiffin.

Btw Tech clearly got Coleman too... So I guess we went 0/7 for our top guys?

Are the rest of y’all finally ready to question whether the former LSU quarterback, Brandon Harris is fit for the job

Yep. Thank god we got a little DB from mighty Rutgers

of course they are, and we would be doing the same to them. Right now we are just at a weird spot and gotta wait this out and see how the staff turns it around

According to Wadlington over at IT this staff doesn’t grind tape looking for prospects as much as rely on word of mouth. His words on their podcast not mine. I have no idea.

I bet you would be surprised to know that 100% of this board doesn't care about that.

Rode harder for his players than sark has this portal cycle.

Texags is here. Sky is falling dudes are fatiguing and muck up threads worse than gifs and memes. All together now: 1 - all on means we are going to be smartly aggressive in looking for talent changers but not at any cost. 2 - we don’t need 5* portalers to win a championship. Love to have them but they aren’t the only answer 3- we don’t know why we missed on a player or why a current one portaled out. If it’s strictly money, so be it. Get their bag, most would 4- sark was explicit in his press conference that we follow the rules and won’t be able to keep folks that overvalue themselves. Some yall don’t care but character has to matter. Overpay for one and the never breaks. 5- there are 4000+ players in the portals we need 15-20. I like our chances of finding pieces the moves us forward even if it isn’t the sexy piece on your bingo cards. Big 6 - one of our own was/is in a life or death situation yesterday. Can we please keep perspective? Maybe it’s the dollar folks but this is the most negative and self pitying tone/tenor of this site’s short existence. Here’s the site for that The end is nigh