Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. It seems like PSU pulled a 2013 Mack Brown, but much more acrimoniously and in the NIL and transfer portal age. They have 2 recruits committed. HC candidates are turning them down. They need to pull a serious rabbit out of a hat. This seems like it could make them irrelevant for a bit.
  3. The BS gets worse every year. Bama has the worst loss of the top 15 hands down. Until you put non-interested parties on the CFP committee, it will be flawed. End of story.
  4. I was there and got to spend it with my daughter at UT. That might have been the loudest rendition of The Eyes of Texas I have ever heard. It gives me goose bumps thinking of it.
  5. I haven’t been brainwashed…Texas lost 3 games. Don’t lose 3 games (one of them being to a sub-.500 team) and we’d be in the playoffs without question. Period.
  6. Yes, but it should not be the on criterion that invalidates Head to Head records and Strength if Schedule. You have been brainwashed by the Committee's malfeasant decision process. Unfortunately we have many others who also lack critical thinking capabilities. Sad time in America.
  7. Which is exactly why total losses is the wrong criteria by which to classify teams. Head to Head and Strength of Schedule must come first. It is non critical thinkers who accept the Committee's losses first criteria. Kind of like the good Germans in the 30s who justified accepting Hitler. The committee ranks teams as it wants, then works backward to make it make sense. This is the fatal flaw of the Committee which invalidates all of its actions. It has negated the value of marquee match ups. The consequence of invalidating such elevated competitive matchups means less CFB fans will be able to view them. Which also means total revenue for the networks and the involved colleges will decline. If Texas and other colleges with premier football programs will not speak against this obviously flawed model, then the networks must. Kudos to Jeff for articulating the obvious flaws of this Committee of program fans and professional pundits expressing personal biases over sober evaluation. The NCAA must do better or be kicked to the gutter by the power conference members.
  8. Who takes the crown for the biggest hater? Tim Brando or Booger McFarland? Both are on generational hate runs.
  9. Thank you
  10. Won't it be exciting to watch North Texas take on Oregon?😗 And who will we root for?
  11. It’s apparently harder for Flood to find than the C spot.
  12. Exactly! How is this not being hammered by anyone, anywhere? I get that bama is 10-2 but still
  13. Jon Gruden did a bit, but it makes more sense than the current format:
  14. Shout out to the real ones! 😂
  15. Today
  16. As the father of a 11 and 14 year old.. I know see why pops was easily agitated lol
  17. Thats all of the dads of school age kids right now lol
  18. LSU owes him money regardless. They're trying to not pay him, but they fired him and gave him a big contract. He can lawyer up and get his money and then some if they play that game.
  19. LSU has to pay Kelly minus the money he makes coaching else.
  20. Stroh to portal is my guess.
  21. Also his fact is purely wrong. FSU was never ranked by the committee. Wish he would get called out.
  22. Love the new OTF I bought!
      • 1
      • Hook 'Em
  23. I haven’t seen this mentioned yet, but what’s the upside of playing the big OOC games? Aggies went on the road and beat ND…and yet they fell below TT, Oregon and Ole Miss with the same record. It’s really hard for me to see why Aggies should be any lower than #4. Miami obviously is seeing no upside. Is the rationale for OU being so far ahead of us their win over Michigan? Seems dumb, but they’re the only school seeing any benefit from scheduling these games.
  24. But then he wouldn't get paid from LSU right? Kelly can just wait for a really good situation and get paid.
  25. Get out of here with that. With that logic tOSU wouldn’t have won the natty last year and we’re asking computers and humans to get the top 2-4 right? Do you not remember 2008?
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.