Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

We were a solid guard away from having a good enough line. Arch needed game experiences for sure but we beat FL and probably OSU with a better left guard alone.

Defense didn’t show up for fl or we win. I think Muschamp solves that.

My point is we weren’t that far away and if we had snuck in, we had a chance to catch fire since no team is elite or flawless.

Some of yall are acting like we are doomed or have scrubs. We’d be very good with no additions with the exception of guard unless a couple in the room stand up. We’re looking for difference makers to clear the way not salvage the day.

image.jpeg.443004e974061ffb42e2a44e6055fb98.jpeg

  • Hook 'Em 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Moderators
Posted
Just now, Thanos72 said:

We were a solid guard away from having a good enough line. Arch needed game experiences for sure but we beat FL and probably OSU with a better left guard alone.

Defense didn’t show up for fl or we win. I think Muschamp solves that.

My point is we weren’t that far away and if we had snuck in, we had a chance to catch fire since no team is elite or flawless.

Some of yall are acting like we are doomed or have scrubs. We’d be very good with no additions with the exception of guard unless a couple in the room stand up. We’re looking for difference makers to clear the way not salvage the day.

image.jpeg.443004e974061ffb42e2a44e6055fb98.jpeg

Yep. 

Texas will add some good parts, while also not getting them all. I am concerned about LB in Muschamp's scheme if Alliegro opts for Ohio State and something doesn't end with a Texas commit by Uluave. For his scheme to maximize, he has to get what he needs at LB. 

Biggest thing for me is team discipline. There is no way Texas can finish 130 in penalties and win anything of true meaning next year. That just shrinks the margin for error too much. 

  • Hook 'Em 12
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

Yep. 

Texas will add some good parts, while also not getting them all. I am concerned about LB in Muschamp's scheme if Alliegro opts for Ohio State and something doesn't end with a Texas commit by Uluave. For his scheme to maximize, he has to get what he needs at LB. 

Biggest thing for me is team discipline. There is no way Texas can finish 130 in penalties and win anything of true meaning next year. That just shrinks the margin for error too much. 

We better do something with our oline coach if we want penalties fixed.  If he stays expect that number to continue to be high.  Him staying and expecting something miraculous to happen with penalties is not reality

Edited by DrunkBevo
Posted
2 hours ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

Yep. 

Texas will add some good parts, while also not getting them all. I am concerned about LB in Muschamp's scheme if Alliegro opts for Ohio State and something doesn't end with a Texas commit by Uluave. For his scheme to maximize, he has to get what he needs at LB. 

Biggest thing for me is team discipline. There is no way Texas can finish 130 in penalties and win anything of true meaning next year. That just shrinks the margin for error too much. 

If Sark is still here don't expect discipline to change. Has been an issue since day 1. 

Posted
2 hours ago, GDI said:

I'm going out on a limb here and predicting no $1.00 month special subscription next year.  

Well.  If their goal was to retain some and grow market awareness, it worked.  Probably the best time to do it instead of when there are lulls in the season.

Posted
3 hours ago, Gerry Hamilton said:

Yep. 

Texas will add some good parts, while also not getting them all. I am concerned about LB in Muschamp's scheme if Alliegro opts for Ohio State and something doesn't end with a Texas commit by Uluave. For his scheme to maximize, he has to get what he needs at LB. 

Biggest thing for me is team discipline. There is no way Texas can finish 130 in penalties and win anything of true meaning next year. That just shrinks the margin for error too much. 

"Muschamp needs his press man corners" and "Muschamp needs two-plus over the ball guys" and "Muschamp needs his physical safety" and "Muschamp needs another game-changing EDGE" and "Muschamp needs two new LBs"... I am worn out haha. Wish I'd just understood earlier that he only likes 5-10 guys on the whole defensive roster 😅

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.