Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, BobInHouston said:

Good place for him. He wouldn't have played as much as he had if he stayed.

I agree.  But I would still like to have him on my team -- off the bench he might spark a win or two, and in practice, he would be a versatile asset.

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
2 hours ago, TexasTom said:

I agree.  But I would still like to have him on my team -- off the bench he might spark a win or two, and in practice, he would be a versatile asset.

A deal has two sides. Weaver would have had to agree to play less, and that didn't consider the money.  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.