UTTUCK Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago I’m sure the majority of evaluations are the eye test during practice sessions , and film study of practices. More specifically OL evaluations. Full contact 11 on 11, can get pretty congested and hard to read in real time. I’m sure this is where film study is most important. Was wondering how much coaches listen to opposing position players input. Hey Gefrard, January, or Hero, “ which one of these guards appear to be the strongest, which one is hardest to get around or through, which one is hardest to get off their block, etc… Same for WR vs DB’s. Any coaches on here??? Quote
Moderators Gerry Hamilton Posted 55 minutes ago Moderators Posted 55 minutes ago 1 hour ago, UTTUCK said: I’m sure the majority of evaluations are the eye test during practice sessions , and film study of practices. More specifically OL evaluations. Full contact 11 on 11, can get pretty congested and hard to read in real time. I’m sure this is where film study is most important. Was wondering how much coaches listen to opposing position players input. Hey Gefrard, January, or Hero, “ which one of these guards appear to be the strongest, which one is hardest to get around or through, which one is hardest to get off their block, etc… Same for WR vs DB’s. Any coaches on here??? I've never heard of that type of coach evaluation. There are so many sets of eyes in personnale departments and coaches and scouts at this point, plus video and analytics breakdowns Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.