Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Mack Brown.  53-16

Conference championships. 0

Sark.  52-21

Conference Championship 1

Many wanted to move on from Mack too. Not sure if Sark will win big bit I found this comparison interesting. 

  • Hook 'Em 10
  • Thanks 2
Posted
6 hours ago, MBHORNSFAN said:

Mack Brown.  53-16

Conference championships. 0

Sark.  52-21

Conference Championship 1

Many wanted to move on from Mack too. Not sure if Sark will win big bit I found this comparison interesting. 

Now do OU record in first 5 years Mack 2-3 and 0-3 against stoops with 1 blowout loss, Sark 3-2 and 3-1 against Venables with 3 blowout wins and 2 others that should’ve been wins. 

  • Hook 'Em 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Comparable, but you also have to factor in outside factors.  Mack didn't have to worry as much about roster turnover due to NIL, but he also couldn't just go out and buy (buy some accounts) the most expensive roster in college football this year.

Posted
11 hours ago, MBHORNSFAN said:

Mack Brown.  53-16

Conference championships. 0

Sark.  52-21

Conference Championship 1

Many wanted to move on from Mack too. Not sure if Sark will win big bit I found this comparison interesting. 

I remember fans getting a bit irked by Mack’s inability to get over the hump. Then he listened to advice, realized his approach to the offense didn’t fit the players, and let Vince be Vince. Sark is at the same crossroads. The question is will he make changes as needed in order to win? TBD

  • Hook 'Em 1
Posted
12 hours ago, MBHORNSFAN said:

Mack Brown.  53-16

Conference championships. 0

Sark.  52-21

Conference Championship 1

Many wanted to move on from Mack too. Not sure if Sark will win big bit I found this comparison interesting. 

 

Careful, a little voice of reason does not usually appease the mob, whose thirst is only quenched by blood.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.