ESPN: 2025 SEC college football projections, preview(in depth)

[Blake Munroe]

There’s no way I can post the thing here, but this is worth a read. 

From Bill Connelly:

https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/45807129/2025-sec-college-football-projections-preview

[MBHORNSFAN]

 

Connelly is a moron. 

 

https://x.com/CFBAlerts_/status/1948856913334042984?t=491gE8hP13_zhyBlG_NAeQ&s=19

[Blake Munroe]

15 minutes ago, MBHORNSFAN said:

 

Connelly is a moron. 

 

https://x.com/CFBAlerts_/status/1948856913334042984?t=491gE8hP13_zhyBlG_NAeQ&s=19

That graphic is misleading. His rankings aren’t “the top coaches in college football”. They are coaches vs expectations rankings. 
 

If you want to learn more, scroll down in this article and he explains it…

https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/45739570/ranking-best-college-football-coaches-last-20-years

 

 

[MBHORNSFAN]

56 minutes ago, Blake Munroe said:

That graphic is misleading. His rankings aren’t “the top coaches in college football”. They are coaches vs expectations rankings. 
 

If you want to learn more, scroll down in this article and he explains it…

https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/45739570/ranking-best-college-football-coaches-last-20-years

 

 

 I read it. Still think he is a moron. 

[Danimal]

2 hours ago, Blake Munroe said:

There’s no way I can post the thing here, but this is worth a read. 

From Bill Connelly:

https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/45807129/2025-sec-college-football-projections-preview

He says Texas has "tenuous depth." Honestly, where is there "tenuous depth" on the roster, especially compared to what other programs have?

I would say across every position Texas would have a top 10 depth.

[Blake Munroe]

13 minutes ago, Danimal said:

He says Texas has "tenuous depth." Honestly, where is there "tenuous depth" on the roster, especially compared to what other programs have?

I would say across every position Texas would have a top 10 depth.

Oh I disagree with a lot he says, including his rankings. I was just pointing out that the graphic title is misleading in the sense of he personally doesn’t necessarily think Heupel is better than Smart or Sark, for example.